Hudson Homes Management LLC

SEC 8-K Filing: Lone Star Funds (2026-04-23)

8-K filing by Lone Star Funds dated 2026-04-23. Document: 8-K. Accession: 0001193125-26-171788.

US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. RAINEY

Foreclosure action by US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust filed March 2026 in District of Maine. Auto-indexed from CourtListener / PACER public records.

SEC 10-K Filing: Hudson Advisors L.P. (2026-03-24)

10-K filing by Hudson Advisors L.P. dated 2026-03-24. Document: 10-K. Accession: 0001326380-26-000013.

SEC 10-K Filing: Lone Star Funds (2026-02-27)

10-K filing by Lone Star Funds dated 2026-02-27. Document: 10-K. Accession: 0001193125-26-082531.

US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. BURNS

Foreclosure action by US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust filed February 2026 in District of Maine. Auto-indexed from CourtListener / PACER public records.

Hudson Homes Management LLC v. Tenants — DISMISSED — Northeast Housing Court MA (2026)

US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. WILSON

Foreclosure action by US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust filed January 2026 in District of Maine. Auto-indexed from CourtListener / PACER public records.

SEC 8-K Filing: Hudson Advisors L.P. (2025-12-09)

8-K filing by Hudson Advisors L.P. dated 2025-12-09. Document: 8-K. Accession: 0001326380-25-000097.

SEC 10-Q Filing: Hudson Advisors L.P. (2025-12-09)

10-Q filing by Hudson Advisors L.P. dated 2025-12-09. Document: 10-Q. Accession: 0001326380-25-000098.

SEC 8-K Filing: Hudson Advisors L.P. (2025-10-07)

8-K filing by Hudson Advisors L.P. dated 2025-10-07. Document: 8-K. Accession: 0001326380-25-000091.

Fair v. Hudson Homes Management LLC — W.D. New York (Federal)

A federal civil case was filed against Hudson Homes Management LLC in the Western District of New York in September 2025, docket 1:25-cv-00932. This is a separate, later filing from the state court case in Orleans County.

Fair v. Hudson Homes Management LLC — Active Federal Case

According to the CourtListener public docket (ID 71456645), this federal civil action was filed September 25, 2025 in the Western District of New York — the most recently filed federal case involving HHM in the archive. No judge assigned as of the archive date. PACER case ID: 157584. The case remains active.

HHM No Cause Eviction — Active (25H77SP004586)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, this No Cause eviction was filed September 12, 2025 — the same day as Eastern Housing Court case 25H84SP005461. Coordinated same-day No Cause filings across two divisions are consistent with a systematic portfolio disposal. The case remains Active.

HHM No Cause Eviction — Eastern Housing Court (25H84SP005461)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, this No Cause eviction was filed September 12, 2025 — the same day as Northeast case 25H77SP004586. Coordinated same-day No Cause filings across two Housing Court divisions are consistent with a systematic portfolio disposal. Unlike the Northeast filing which remains Active, this case is Closed — the eviction was completed.

SEC 10-Q Filing: Hudson Advisors L.P. (2025-09-09)

10-Q filing by Hudson Advisors L.P. dated 2025-09-09. Document: 10-Q. Accession: 0001326380-25-000075.

MUHAMMAD v. LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST

Docket: 2:25-cv-05093. Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. BUSH

Cause: 28:1441 Notice of Removal. Docket: 3:25-cv-01505. Court: District Court, N.D. Florida. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

US Bank Trust LSF9 v. Bush — Civil Rights Case, N.D. Florida (2025)

According to the CourtListener public docket (3:25-cv-01505), U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust filed this federal action September 2, 2025 in the Northern District of Florida. Cause of action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal. Nature of suit: Civil Rights: Other. The case was removed from state court to federal court. Terminated October 14, 2025 — 42 days after filing, consistent with the pattern of rapid termination seen in Georgia FDCPA cases.

HHM No Cause Eviction — Tenant Reopened Case (25H77SP004273)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, HHM filed a No Cause eviction — no nonpayment or lease violation alleged — August 25, 2025. The case was subsequently Reopened, indicating the defendant successfully moved to reopen the proceeding. Consistent with portfolio wind-down pattern.

Mehl v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1331(a)rp Fed. Question: Real Property. Docket: 7:25-cv-06226. Court: District Court, S.D. New York. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

Mehl et al v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust — Antitrust, Federal Real Property (Active)

According to the CourtListener public docket (ID 70975567) and Justia, Batsheva and Norbert Mehl filed this federal action July 28, 2025 in the Southern District of New York. Nature of suit: 410 Anti-Trust. Cause: 28:1331(a)rp Federal Question: Real Property. The complaint names LSF9 Master Participation Trust alongside Fay Servicing LLC, Auction.com Inc., and a real estate LLC as co-defendants. PACER case ID: 646763. Magistrate Judge Victoria Reznik designated for referrals. Filed by pro se plaintiffs with 05 filing fee paid. Last known filing: October 8, 2025. Case remains Active.

In re Eddie Anthony Bland — N.D. Georgia Bankruptcy Ch.13 (HHM Creditor, 2025, Active)

According to the CourtListener public docket (25-41071, PACER case ID 1278106), Eddie Anthony Bland filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy in the Northern District of Georgia on July 22, 2025. Hudson Homes Management appears as a creditor. The case remains Active. Filed in Georgia during the peak of the documented wind-down period, this is the most recent bankruptcy filing with HHM as creditor in the archive.

Eddie Anthony Bland — Bankruptcy, N.D. Georgia (HHM Creditor — 2025)

Bankruptcy case filed July 22, 2025 in the Northern District of Georgia. Docket 25-41071. Hudson Homes Management appears as a creditor — consistent with the wind-down pattern where HHM files eviction proceedings and tenants respond by filing bankruptcy to trigger the automatic stay and halt displacement. This is a 2025 filing, placing it squarely within the LSF9 portfolio wind-down period.

HHM / LSF9 v. Section 8 Tenants — DISMISSED ON VAWA — Northeast Housing Court, Essex County MA

Summary process eviction filed by HHM as agent for U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust against Section 8 tenants in Essex County, Massachusetts. Tenancy commenced 2019. HHM issued Notice to Vacate December 2024 and Notice to Quit May 2025, citing property sale as the basis. Summary process filed October 2025. Defendants filed Motion to Dismiss on three independent grounds: (1) HHM lacks standing under Rental Property Management Services v. Hatcher, 479 Mass. 542 (2018) — the original 2019 lease names a different property management entity as Lessor, not HHM; (2) Notice to Quit fails the federal good cause requirement under 24 CFR §982.310(d) for Section 8 tenancies — no good cause was stated; (3) VAWA Notice of Occupancy Rights was never provided — a federal violation under 34 U.S.C. §12491. The eviction was dismissed on VAWA grounds. The court did not need to reach the standing or Section 8 defects.

Stephens v. American Arbitration Association Incorporated

Antitrust class action (Docket 2:25-cv-01650) filed May 2025 in District of Arizona. Hudson Homes Management named as party. Nature of suit: 410 Other Statutes: Anti-Trust. Judge John Joseph Tuchi presiding. Auto-indexed from CourtListener / PACER public records.

Shelbey Raeann Langston — Bankruptcy, W.D. Oklahoma (HHM/LSF9 — 2025)

Bankruptcy case filed May 13, 2025 in the Western District of Oklahoma. Docket 25-11442. Filed during the active LSF9 portfolio wind-down period. Consistent pattern of tenants filing bankruptcy in response to HHM eviction proceedings to trigger automatic stay protection under 11 U.S.C. § 362.

In re Langston — HHM/LSF9 Named in Oklahoma Bankruptcy (Active 2025)

According to the CourtListener public docket (25-11442), this Chapter 13 bankruptcy was filed May 13, 2025 in the Western District of Oklahoma with Hudson Homes Management and LSF9 Master Participation Trust appearing as creditors. The case remains Active. Tenant bankruptcies in which HHM appears as a creditor are consistent with the pattern of HHM pursuing collection actions — including through IQ Data International — that drive tenants into financial distress severe enough to require bankruptcy protection.

KAC 2021-1, LLC v. Hudson SFR Property Holdings, LLC

A Florida appellate court reversed the dismissal of a Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA) claim against Hudson SFR Property Holdings, LLC and remanded. The claim arose from a three-day eviction notice left on the tenant's door; the court held the trial court wrongly concluded Hudson could not be a 'debt collector' under the statute and wrongly denied leave to amend.

Sorrentino v. U.S. Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 3:25-cv-00171. Court: District Court, D. Connecticut. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

Fair v. Hudson Homes Management LLC

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges systematic misrepresentation in property management practices. The filing names Lone Star Funds directly as a co-defendant.

HHM New England Operations — NewEnglandResidents@HudsonHomesMGMT.com

NewEnglandResidents@HudsonHomesMGMT.com is the official Hudson Homes Management LLC contact email for New England region tenants, confirmed by its appearance in court-filed documents in Northeast Housing Court Docket No. [docket on file]. The email appears in: (1) the December 10, 2024 Notice to Vacate (Exhibit E) sent to an Essex County, MA property, Lynn MA tenants, directing them to contact this address to 'schedule your move-out and provide your new forwarding address for the Security Deposit'; and (2) the signature block of the same notice, signed 'Hudson Homes Management — NewEnglandResidents@HudsonHomesMGMT.com.' This confirms HHM operated a dedicated New England tenant communications channel, treating Massachusetts and surrounding states as a distinct operational unit. The subdomain structure (HudsonHomesMGMT.com) is relevant to the entity name discrepancy documented throughout this case — HHM operates under multiple name variations across filings, leases, and corporate records.

US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 — Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal (2023-1694, November 2024)

P. Ameral v. Debt Collector Attorneys/LSF9 — Massachusetts Southeast Housing Court — Federal Complaint (November 22, 2024)

In a companion challenge to her federal complaint, Patricia Ameral contested the Massachusetts Southeast Housing Court proceeding brought against her, arguing the plaintiffs 'lacked standing over Pat, while pretending to be her landlord while Pat is a homeowner.' Her position is that a summary-process/eviction posture is legally improper against an owner (as opposed to a tenant), and that a housing-court administrative tribunal lacks the expertise and authority to adjudicate the constitutional property rights at stake — which, she argues, require an Article III court and a jury. Documented as a homeowner's standing/jurisdiction challenge that mirrors the Massachusetts VAWA-dismissal and standing themes elsewhere in the archive (where courts have questioned whether the LSF9-affiliated party is properly positioned to remove an occupant). Specific docket and disposition to be confirmed directly.

LSF9 Master Participation Trust c/o HHM Selling Properties in Louisville & Goshen KY — Property Deed Records (2024)

Cooper v. I.Q. Data International — FCRA / HHM Debt Collection (Maryland)

According to the CourtListener public docket (1:24-cv-02120), this Fair Credit Reporting Act case was filed July 23, 2024 in the District of Maryland. The case names I.Q. Data International — the debt collector documented in BBB complaints as HHM's collections partner for move-out balances. Together with Nelson v. I.Q. Data (Michigan, 2022) and the Sturgill v. Equifax (Georgia, 2024) FCRA case, this represents at least three federal filings in which former tenants challenged credit reporting practices in disputes connected to HHM's post-move-out collection pipeline.

In re Tamara Shaneka Johnson — D. New Jersey Bankruptcy Ch.13 (HHM Creditor, 2024, Active)

According to the CourtListener public docket (24-16689), Tamara Shaneka Johnson filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy in the District of New Jersey on July 2, 2024. Hudson Homes Management appears as a creditor. The case remains Active. This is the most recent New Jersey bankruptcy case with HHM as creditor in the archive, filed during the documented wind-down period (2024). New Jersey is not a state where HHM's active rental markets are publicly documented, suggesting the creditor relationship may derive from LSF9's broader debt collection activities in the state.

Hudson Homes Management v. Davis — N.D. Georgia Federal Court (2024)

According to the CourtListener public docket (1:24-cv-02609), Hudson Homes Management filed this federal action on June 14, 2024 in the Northern District of Georgia, assigned to Judge Steven D. Grimberg. The case was terminated July 23, 2024 — 39 days after filing, consistent with the rapid-termination pattern documented in HHM's FDCPA-classified Georgia cases. PacerMonitor confirms the docket exists. CourtListener docket ID: 70571400.

D'Aguilar v. US Bank Trust NA LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 15:1601 Truth in Lending. Docket: 1:24-cv-04498. Court: District Court, S.D. New York. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. United States of America (DOJ) — Federal Court New Mexico (1:2024cv00431, July 2024)

LSF9 Master Participation Trust filed this action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico (1:24-cv-00431, filed May 6, 2024) naming the United States (through the DOJ) as defendant. This is a routine but revealing filing: when the United States holds a junior lien on a property (commonly an IRS tax lien), a foreclosing party must join the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 2410 to extinguish or subordinate that interest and deliver clear title at sale. The case documents LSF9 acting affirmatively as a foreclosure plaintiff in New Mexico — the same state where the trust's standing was successfully challenged (Zangara) and where the Court of Appeals addressed its statute-of-limitations position (Sanchez, Cain). Documented as an LSF9-initiated lien-priority action; specific disposition to be confirmed from the docket.

Sturgill v. Equifax — Fair Credit Reporting Act, HHM Debt Reporting (Georgia)

According to the CourtListener public docket (1:24-cv-01699), this Fair Credit Reporting Act case — cause of action 15:1681, nature of suit 480 Consumer Credit — was filed April 22, 2024 in the Northern District of Georgia and terminated September 27, 2024. The case appears in CourtListener search results alongside HHM cases, consistent with a pattern of former HHM tenants disputing credit bureau reporting of balances sent to collections after move-out. The FCRA requires accurate, verified reporting; disputed debts that are reported without investigation can be legally challenged.

Robinson v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:24-cv-00117. Court: District Court, D. Rhode Island. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Hudson Homes Management v. Bryant — GA Dispossessory (Gwinnett County)

Hudson Homes Management vs Bryant — Eviction (Georgia)

HHM as Managing Agent for LSF8 — First LSF8 Confirmation (24H77SP001304)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, this case identifies HHM as managing agent for the LSF8 Master Participation Trust — a third Lone Star trust entity distinct from LSF9 and LSF10, documented for the first time in this archive. Filed the same day as LSF9 case 24H77SP001323.

Hudson Homes Management LLC v. Bryant et al

Dispossessory/eviction action filed February 2024 in Gwinnett County, Georgia. Case No. 24-M-07389. Part of HHM wind-down eviction wave across its portfolio. Attorney Dene S. Perusse representing plaintiff.

HHM v. Tenant — Standing Dismissed

According to BPIA reporting, the court dismissed the eviction after HHM failed to demonstrate its agency relationship with U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust.

HHM v. Bryant — Gwinnett County

The docket reflects an eviction case filed in Gwinnett County, Georgia in 2024. Hudson Homes Management LLC is listed as the plaintiff.

Hudson Homes Management v. Bryant, Artesia et al — Georgia Dispossessory (24-M-07389, 2024)

Kile v. Hudson Homes Management LLC + Northsight Management LLC

HHM v. [Defendant] — Ohio Municipal Court — LSF9 Eviction Dismissed (2024)

Hudson Homes Management LLC brought an eviction case in Ohio claiming to be both owner of the property and agent for the lessor — LSF9 Master Participation Trust. Defendant's counsel, assisted by licensed PI Bill Paatalo (OR PSID #49411), filed a motion to dismiss challenging HHM's standing and authority. The magistrate granted leave for HHM to file a responsive brief proving its authority. HHM filed nothing and produced no evidence of standing at the hearing beyond pointing to the county auditor's website. The magistrate dismissed. This case is documented by Paatalo at bpinvestigativeagency.com and is directly analogous to HHM's pending Massachusetts eviction (Docket No. [MA docket]), where HHM is using the same January 2019 Florida-recorded LPOA as its only proof of authority. Same plaintiff, same LSF9 structure, same LPOA, same result when challenged.

Qwanean Smith v. Hudson Homes Management LLC — Seminole County FL — Tenant Sues HHM for Debt Collection (December 2023)

Smith v. Hudson Homes Management LLC — Debt Collection Lawsuit

O'Brien v. Rushmore Loan Management / Caliber / John P. Grayken — D. Connecticut (2023)

Case No. 3:23-cv-01369. Filed October 2023 in the District of Connecticut. CRITICALLY: John P. Grayken — the founder of Lone Star Funds and ultimate beneficial owner of the LSF9/HHM enterprise — is named personally as a defendant alongside Rushmore Loan Management (an LSF9 servicer) and Caliber Home Loans. Filed as Diversity-Fraud. Case terminated March 31, 2025. This is one of the very few federal cases where a plaintiff named Grayken personally in connection with LSF9 servicing practices. Assigned to Judge Michael Peter Shea.

Hudson Homes Management LLC v. Curnoles — Delaware County PA (Case JP17-23-004263)

HSFRF 2 v. Lyons — Second Lone Star HSFRF Entity, N.D. Georgia

According to the CourtListener public docket (ID 70488007), HSFRF 2 — a second Lone Star Funds single-family residential fund entity — filed this federal action September 1, 2023 in the Northern District of Georgia. Judge Jean-Paul Boulee presided. PACER case ID: 319855. Terminated September 29, 2023 — 28 days after filing. The case follows the identical pattern as HSFRF 3 v. Cooks (filed March 2023, terminated 28 days later) and HHM v. Cooks (filed October 2022, terminated 22 days later): a Lone Star entity files a federal action and voluntarily dismisses within 30 days. HSFRF 2 and HSFRF 3 are now both confirmed as separately named federal litigants.

HHM No Cause Eviction — Earliest MA No Cause (23H83SP02806PL)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, HHM filed this No Cause eviction August 14, 2023 — the earliest documented No Cause filing by HHM in Massachusetts, predating the 2025 No Cause filings by more than two years. Consistent with portfolio wind-down pattern beginning earlier than previously documented. The case remains Active.

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. HALL

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:23-cv-00188. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

HSFRF 3 v. Cooks — Lone Star Entity, Same Family

According to the CourtListener public docket (ID 67208224), HSFRF 3 — a Lone Star Funds affiliated entity — filed this federal eviction action against the same Cooks family named in HHM v. Cooks five months earlier. Nature of suit: 230 Rent Lease and Ejectment. Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Same judge (Pannell), same defendants. PACER case ID: 313733. Terminated April 24, 2023 — 28 days after filing.

Raymond Anderson v. Hudson Homes Management LLC + Northsight Management LLC — Federal Lawsuit

HSFRF 3 v. Cooks

Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Docket: 1:23-cv-01298. Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Hudson Homes Management".

HSFRF 3 et al. v. Cooks — N.D. Georgia

Public court records reflect a federal property case filed by HSFRF 3 (Hudson Single-Family Residential Fund 3), an affiliated Lone Star entity, in the Northern District of Georgia. The same property dispute was previously the subject of Hudson Homes Management v. Cooks (1:22-CV-04142). Docket number 1:23-CV-01298.

Hudson Homes Management LLC v. Kingsbury, Michael et al

Summary process eviction filed March 2023 in New London County, CT. Case No. KNO-CV23-6108816-S. HHM acting as agent for LSF10 Master Participation Trust. Represented by Neubert Pepe & Monteith PC. Part of HHM wind-down eviction wave.

HHM as Agent for US Bank Trust / LSF10 Master Participation Trust v. Nerbonne et al — Connecticut (KNL-CV23-6117835, March 2023)

HHM as Agent for LSF10 v. Kingsbury — New London County CT

According to Trellis.Law, Hudson Homes Management LLC, acting as agent and legal representative for U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF10 Master Participation Trust, filed a housing case in New London County, Connecticut. The filing was represented by Neubert Pepe & Monteith PC. Case KNO-CV23-6108816-S.

Hudson Homes Management LLC as Agent for US Bank Trust/LSF9 v. Kingsbury, Michael et al — Connecticut New London County (KNO-CV23-6108816-S)

Hudson Homes Management LLC as Agent v. Kingsbury — Housing/Summary Process (Connecticut)

HHM as Agent for LSF10 Trust v. Kingsbury — CT Housing (New London County)

In re: Farina — US Bankruptcy Court New Jersey — LSF9 Securitization Fraud

Hudson Homes Management LLC as Agent for LSF9 v. Eddie Carrillo et al

Summary process eviction filed in Hartford County, Connecticut. Case No. HFH-CV23-6024625-S. HHM acting as agent for LSF9 Master Participation Trust. Part of HHM wind-down eviction wave across Connecticut portfolio.

HHM v. Kyesha White — Tarrant County

The docket reflects a $10,122 default judgment entered against the tenant.

Hudson Homes Management LLC v. Khamphong Manyvongsa — Georgia

Smith v. Hudson Homes Management LLC — Seminole County

Public records show a tenant-initiated complaint filed against Hudson Homes Management LLC in Seminole County, Florida in 2023.

HSFRF 2 / Hudson Homes Management v. Redding & Gurley

Public court records reflect an eviction case filed by HSFRF 2 and Hudson Homes Management against tenants Janell Redding and Maurice Gurley, identifying the Lone Star-affiliated HSFRF fund entities as beneficial owners in the eviction chain. Case 23-1556DS per Trellis.Law.

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF11 Master Participation Trust v. Lendia, Inc.

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment. Docket: 4:22-cv-40153. Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

US Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 v. JPMorgan Chase, Washington Mutual et al (Stella Lykos) — NY Supreme Court — RPAPL §1304 Trial (November 2022)

Nelson v. I.Q. Data International — FCRA / HHM Debt Collection (Michigan)

According to the CourtListener public docket, this Fair Credit Reporting Act case was filed November 9, 2022 in the Eastern District of Michigan. The case names I.Q. Data International — the debt collection agency documented in multiple BBB complaints as the firm HHM uses to collect and report tenant debts to credit bureaus after move-out. I.Q. Data has over 350 CFPB complaints and a 1.01/5 BBB rating. The CFPB made debt parking — placing collection accounts on credit reports without prior notice to the consumer — explicitly prohibited under Regulation F in 2021.

Thomason v. LSF10 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 22-08019. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

Raymond Anderson v. Hudson Homes Management LLC, Northsight Management LLC — N.D. Georgia

Public court records reflect a federal civil case naming both Hudson Homes Management LLC and Northsight Management LLC as co-defendants in the Northern District of Georgia. The filing identifies Northsight as HHM's affiliated maintenance management entity. Docket number 1:22-CV-06731.

Gonzalez v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee of LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 5:22-cv-01175. Court: District Court, W.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Hudson Homes Management v. Cooks — Federal Property Case (N.D. Georgia)

Hudson Homes Management v. Cooks — FDCPA Classification

According to the CourtListener public docket (ID 66923529), HHM filed this federal eviction action October 17, 2022. Nature of suit: 230 Rent Lease and Ejectment. Cause of action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act — classifying HHM as a debt collector under federal law. Judge Charles A. Pannell Jr. presided. PACER case ID: 308446. Terminated November 8, 2022 — 22 days after filing.

Hudson Homes Management v. Cooks — Northern District of Georgia Federal Court (1:2022cv04142) — Rent/Lease/Ejectment

Turner v. U.S. Bank Trust N.A. not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee of LSF10 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 4:22-cv-00906. Court: District Court, N.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF10".

John Henry Andreozzi Jr. — Bankruptcy, M.D. Florida (HHM — 2022)

Bankruptcy case filed September 12, 2022 in the Middle District of Florida. Docket 8:22-bk-03722. Hudson Homes Management listed as creditor. Part of the documented pattern of HHM tenants across multiple states filing bankruptcy to halt eviction proceedings.

US Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 v. Association of Apartment Owners of Elima Lani Condominiums — Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals (2022) — Affirmed

This is a lien-priority foreclosure dispute, not a homeowner eviction. U.S. Bank Trust as trustee for LSF9 obtained summary judgment and an interlocutory decree of foreclosure in Hawai'i's Third Circuit Court (Judge Robert D.S. Kim, Dec 11, 2018). The Association of Apartment Owners of Elima Lani Condominiums appealed, arguing the court had wrongly divested it of equitable title and improperly authorized the foreclosure commissioner to take possession and collect rents. The Hawai'i Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed in a summary disposition order (CAAP-19-0000004, Sept 8, 2022), holding the circuit court did not vest title in the commissioner and did not abuse its discretion in directing the commissioner to take possession and collect rental payments pending sale, citing Bank of New York Mellon v. Larrua. Documented honestly as an LSF9 WIN in a contest between the trust and a condominium association over lien priority and rents — included for completeness of the LSF9 litigation footprint (which extends well beyond mainland single-family foreclosures into Hawai'i condominium-association priority fights), not as a homeowner-eviction matter.

LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Cain — New Mexico Court of Appeals

The New Mexico Court of Appeals issued a decision in Case A-1-CA-38703 examining whether LSF9 Master Participation Trust had standing to bring a foreclosure action. The court analyzed the chain of title and assignment issues central to LSF9's legal structure. Per the published opinion, the court found the standing question turned on the note transfer chain from the original lender through LSF9.

In re Fracasso — D. New Jersey Bankruptcy Ch.13 (HHM/LSF9 Creditor, 2022, Still Active)

According to the CourtListener public docket (22-15796, ID 63891510), Benjamin and GeriAnn Fracasso filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy in the District of New Jersey on July 22, 2022. Hudson Homes Management and LSF9 Master Participation Trust appear as creditors. Critically, this case remains Active as of 2026 — over three years after filing. A long-running Chapter 13 with HHM as creditor suggests ongoing repayment plan negotiations or disputes involving the trust entity. This is the only confirmed multi-year active bankruptcy case with HHM as creditor in the archive.

US Bank LSF9 + WRI + HHM v. McLean et al — 0,806 Default Judgment (22H83SP01729PL)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, three entities filed jointly as co-plaintiffs — U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9, WRI Property Management, and Hudson Homes Management LLC — all represented by Jahangir Zaheer, Esq. (Zaheer Law Group, Lynnfield MA). Property: 22 Twelfth Street, Onset MA 02558. Five defendants appeared Pro Se and defaulted. Default judgment of 0,806.76 entered August 2, 2022 at 12 percent annual interest. First documented Massachusetts case showing WRI and HHM filing jointly as co-plaintiffs.

HHM v. Defendant — Northeast Housing Court (22H77SP002127)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, HHM filed a nonpayment eviction June 6, 2022 at the Northeast Housing Court Salem Session — among the earliest documented HHM filings in Massachusetts. Filed same day as 22H77SP002128.

HHM (Agent for LSF9) v. Defendant — Active 4 Years (22H77SP002128)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, this nonpayment eviction filed June 6, 2022 remains Active as of March 2026 — nearly four years after filing. Filed same day as 22H77SP002127. The prolonged duration strongly suggests a contested proceeding.

Richard Clark v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust — 9th Circuit (22-35343, 2022 — Second Appeal)

In the second Clark matter (9th Cir. No. 22-35343; underlying D. Or. 6:20-cv-00295-MC, 2022 WL 900540), Clark sought a declaratory judgment that the LSF9 defendants held no legal or equitable rights in the note or deed of trust and lacked standing to foreclose. The district court dismissed: because Clark had admitted during his 2009 bankruptcy that Wells Fargo (predecessor to the LSF9 chain) was a secured creditor of the loan, he was judicially estopped from later taking the opposite position, and neither Wells Fargo nor its successors were barred by claim/issue preclusion from the earlier dismissed state foreclosure. A companion 2023 opinion (6:21-cv-01139-MC) rejected the Clarks' related wrongful-foreclosure theories, with the court noting the litigation appeared aimed at prolonging foreclosure rather than resolving who was owed. Documented honestly: LSF9/U.S. Bank prevailed; Clark's standing challenge FAILED on judicial-estoppel grounds. A useful counter-example showing the standing defense fails where the homeowner previously acknowledged the secured debt.

Gidley & Rivera v. HHM — TRO Granted Against HHM (22H83CV00088PL)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, two tenants — both granted Affidavits of Indigency — filed a civil action against HHM and US Bank Trust NA April 1, 2022. Judge Donna Salvidio granted the Temporary Restraining Order against HHM on April 5, 2022. HHM retained counsel (Charles S. Mancuso, Esq.) and filed opposition. US Bank Trust appeared Pro Se. TRO extended through May 15, 2022. Joint Memorandum on the Status of Plaintiffs Housing filed May 13, 2022.

U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee of LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Estevez

Docket: 1:22-cv-00106. Court: District Court, D. Rhode Island. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Hudson Homes Management LLC v. Kyesha White and All Occupants — Tarrant County TX Justice Court (March 2022)

HHM v. White — $10,122 Default Judgment (Tarrant County TX)

Hudson Homes Management LLC vs Kyesha White — Default Judgment $10,122 (Texas)

Hudson Homes Management LLC v. Kyesha White and All Occupants

Forcible detainer eviction filed March 2022 in Tarrant County, Texas. Default judgment of $10,122.09 awarded to HHM. Writ of possession served April 1, 2022. Judge Jason M. Charbonnet presiding. Case disposed.

LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. De Stio, Joseph — Hillsborough County FL (Tampa) — Judgment for Possession

LSF9 Master Participation Trust (through U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., rep. by Mark R. Lippman) filed a residential eviction against Joseph De Stio and other occupants in Hillsborough County, Florida (filed Jan 28, 2022; Judge J. Logan Murphy). The court entered a judgment for possession (Instrument No. 2022101385) and a writ of possession was served by posting on March 15, 2022. Documented honestly as an LSF9 post-foreclosure eviction WIN — it shows the back end of the machine: after the trust takes title to a single-family home through foreclosure, it moves in county court to remove the remaining occupants via writ of possession. This is the stage at which Hudson Homes Management typically takes over property management, and it illustrates why standing defects matter most at the FORECLOSURE stage — once a possession judgment issues, the occupants' options narrow sharply.

HHM v. Downing — LSF10 — Lackawanna County

The filing identifies HHM acting as attorney-in-fact for U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF10 Master Participation Trust — a separate trust entity within the Lone Star network.

Delhi Police v. John Grayken — RattanIndia

Delhi police accused founder John Grayken of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy related to ownership of RattanIndia Finance.

SEC v. Hudson Advisors L.P. — Release No. 2022-159

The SEC announced that the respondents agreed to pay $11.2 million in civil penalties for failing to disclose that fund fees were used to cover the founder's personal income tax liability — totaling $54.6 million over 13 years across 14 funds.

Hodgins v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust — Florida 2nd DCA (2d2022-2898, July 2024)

Susan and Nicholas Hodgins appealed a final foreclosure judgment for U.S. Bank Trust as trustee for LSF9 (No. 2D2022-2898, Fla. 2d DCA 2024). They argued the judgment covered property not secured by the mortgage, failed to state a claim against Nicholas, and warranted involuntary dismissal. U.S. Bank confessed error only on the first point — the legal description erroneously included submerged lands — and the court reversed solely to conform the description, otherwise leaving the foreclosure intact. Documented honestly: this is a case LSF9 substantially won on appeal, included here as part of the complete Florida record rather than as a homeowner victory.

In re Barbara Simone — D. Connecticut Bankruptcy Ch.7 (HHM/LSF9 Creditor, 2021)

According to the CourtListener public docket (21-30867), Barbara Simone filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the District of Connecticut on November 1, 2021. Hudson Homes Management and LSF9 Master Participation Trust appear as creditors. Chapter 7 is a liquidation bankruptcy. HHM's appearance as a creditor in a Chapter 7 filing indicates the tenant was in acute financial distress. This adds Connecticut to the states with confirmed HHM-as-creditor bankruptcy filings.

Garcia v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee fro LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship). Docket: 7:21-cv-00387. Court: District Court, S.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Lone Star" "Master Participation Trust".

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF11 Master v. Vincent

Docket: 21-00201. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

Burwell v. Hudson Home Management, LLC

According to the CourtListener public docket (ID 59989172), this federal civil action was filed June 16, 2021. Nature of suit: 370 Other Fraud. Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Tort. The plaintiff demanded a jury trial. Judge William E. Smith presided; Magistrate Lincoln D. Almond referred. Terminated July 19, 2021 — 33 days after filing.

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Montoya

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement. Docket: 5:21-cv-00402. Court: District Court, W.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

In re James John Farrell — D. New Jersey Bankruptcy Ch.13 (HHM Creditor, 2021)

According to the CourtListener public docket (21-12301), James John Farrell filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy in the District of New Jersey on March 22, 2021. Hudson Homes Management and LSF9 Master Participation Trust appear as creditors. Chapter 13 is a reorganization plan — when HHM appears as creditor in a Chapter 13 filing, the tenant is typically attempting to resolve or halt an eviction through federal bankruptcy protection. This is the earliest documented New Jersey bankruptcy case with HHM as creditor in the archive.

Peterson v. Citibank/LSF9 — Washington State Court of Appeals — Standing Challenge Remanded (2021 Wash.)

The Petersons appealed a Mason County summary judgment of foreclosure. In Citibank, N.A. v. Peterson, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 516 (decided March 9, 2021), Division II of the Washington Court of Appeals reversed the summary judgment and remanded — a homeowner-favorable appellate outcome that became the 'law of the case.' On remand, the foreclosure was prosecuted in the name of U.S. Bank Trust as trustee for the LSF9 Master Participation Trust with Caliber Home Loans as servicer; the Petersons (with expert declarations from foreclosure analyst William Paatalo) challenged whether those entities had standing and whether their California counsel had any retainer authority to act for the named plaintiff trust. The case is a documented instance of the LSF9/Caliber structure's standing being contested on appeal and the bank's summary judgment being undone.

US Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 v. Discover Bank — Dutchess County NY (2021) — Disposed/Dismissed

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. BLAINE

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:21-cv-00044. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

Myron Hale v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship). Docket: 2:20-cv-11375. Court: District Court, C.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Carpentras HOA v. Hudson Homes Management & US Bank Trust — Manatee County, Florida

According to the UniCourt public record, a homeowners association filed suit December 8, 2020 in Manatee County, Florida against HHM, U.S. Bank Trust N.A., and the tenants in possession — naming all three as defendants simultaneously. Judge Edward Nicholas presided. The filing documents show HHM managing a property that the HOA was taking action against for covenant violations, with both HHM and US Bank Trust receiving summons in December 2020. This is a documented instance of HHM being sued by a third party (HOA) rather than filing suit itself.

Richard Clark v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust et al — 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (20-36058, 2020)

Richard Clark (pro se) appealed the D. Oregon's denial of his motions for a TRO and preliminary injunction to stop a foreclosure sale (9th Cir. No. 20-36058; underlying 6:20-cv-00295-MC). The Ninth Circuit VACATED and REMANDED the preliminary-injunction denial because the district court had denied relief for lack of 'likelihood of success on the merits' without explanation, and a promised formal opinion never followed; the panel directed the district court to make findings. It did NOT reach the merits and did not hold that Clark's foreclosure challenge succeeds. Documented honestly as a procedural remand, not a homeowner win. Related to the second Clark appeal (22-35343), where the district court's dismissal of Clark's declaratory-judgment action was ultimately at issue.

US Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 v. Augustine — NY Civil Court — Post-Foreclosure Holdover Eviction (December 2021 / 2022) — Motion to Dismiss Denied

EZEKWO v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.

Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act. Docket: 2:20-cv-16187. Court: District Court, D. New Jersey. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. VINCENT

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:20-cv-00380. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

SEC S-1 Filing: NewRez LLC (2020-10-02)

S-1 filing by NewRez LLC dated 2020-10-02. Document: S-1. Accession: 0001193125-20-261576.

SEC S-1 Filing: Lone Star Global Acquisitions (2020-10-02)

S-1 filing by Lone Star Global Acquisitions dated 2020-10-02. Document: S-1. Accession: 0001193125-20-261576.

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. COX

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:20-cv-00316. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

BOVIAR v. LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST

Docket: 2:20-cv-12255. Court: District Court, D. New Jersey. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., As Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Salgado

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief. Docket: 3:20-cv-00212. Court: District Court, W.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 v. Keefe — Maine — DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (July 19, 2020)

In U.S. Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 v. Keefe, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine dismissed LSF9's foreclosure action WITH PREJUDICE on July 19, 2020. A dismissal with prejudice is a merits-level defeat: unlike a dismissal without prejudice (which lets the trust refile), it bars LSF9 from bringing the same foreclosure claim again. The case is cited by foreclosure-defense researchers as an example of the LSF9/U.S. Bank Trust structure failing to meet its burden of proof. It sits alongside the Ohio magistrate dismissal and the Oregon quiet-title judgment as one of the documented instances where the trust could not establish what it needed to foreclose — and here the defeat was permanent.

LSF9 v. Plummer — Maine Federal (2:20-cv-00171-DBH) — Lost Assignment/Ghost Company

U.S. Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 sued to foreclose against Lee A. Plummer in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine (2:20-cv-00171-DBH). The case is a documented example of the LETOM 'ghost company' / Lost Assignment Affidavit defect at the heart of the LSF9 straw-man analysis: the complaint alleged the mortgage was assigned via a 'Lost Assignment Affidavit' dated 2019, in which Caliber (servicing for the trust) admitted it could NOT verify the chain of title because the note and mortgage had been sold at some point by LETOM MANAGEMENT, LLC — and no agent or officer of LETOM could be located. Facing that dead end, Caliber recorded an affidavit assigning the note to the trust itself, then represented to the court that 'the Mortgage was then assigned to Federal National Mortgage Association.' Procedurally, the trust could not even locate or serve the defendant: on Feb 16, 2021 the court denied its motion for alternate service by publication (finding it left the Wilcox Hospital, Hawaii employment lead unexplored and failed to supply the required Maine Rule 4(g) draft order), and the docket terminated Sept 8, 2022. Documented honestly: the trust obtained no merits foreclosure judgment here, and the case is significant less for its disposition than for the exhibit-level proof (the Lost Assignment Affidavit) that the LSF9 chain of title can trace back to an unlocatable seller (LETOM) — the 'selling the Brooklyn Bridge' chain-of-title problem. Pairs directly with the archive's lsf9-letom-ghost-company-lost-assignment evidence item.

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. WELCH

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:20-cv-00140. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

Lawrence v. US Bank NA as Trustee for LSF9 — Florida 4th District Court of Appeal (4D19-637, Broward County) — Affirmed March 2020

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. DUNTON

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:20-cv-00098. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. O'CONNOR

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:20-cv-00092. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

James v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 20-01019. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

Clark v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract. Docket: 6:20-cv-00295. Court: District Court, D. Oregon. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 7:20-cv-00054. Court: District Court, S.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Hudson Homes Management LLC OBO US Bank NA as Trustee for LSF9 v. Hayden, Marsha

Residential eviction filed February 2020 in Palm Beach County, Florida. Case dismissed without prejudice August 2020 by Judge Melanie D. Surber. Early example of HHM filing evictions as agent for LSF9 without proper standing — same defect documented in Ohio and Massachusetts cases.

HHM OBO US Bank / LSF9 v. Hayden — Dismissed Without Prejudice (Palm Beach FL, 2020)

Hudson Homes Management, filing on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust as trustee for LSF9, brought a foreclosure/possession action against Marsha Hayden in Palm Beach County, Florida (2020) that was dismissed without prejudice. This is documented as part of the Florida record showing the HHM-as-agent-for-LSF9 structure being tested in court; a dismissal without prejudice is a procedural end to the filing rather than a merits determination, and is included here for completeness of the docket record rather than as a decisive homeowner win.

US Bank Trust LSF8 c/o HHM v. Persaud — Queens County Civil Court (Pending)

According to the UniCourt public record, U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust, c/o Hudson Homes Management LLC filed a property case February 7, 2020 in Queens County Civil Court. Judge Honorable Maria Ressos presided. The case status remains Pending — Other Pending, with appearances adjourned multiple times. This is one of the earliest documented appearances of HHM as managing agent for LSF8 in the New York court system, predating the 2024 Massachusetts LSF8 confirmation by four years.

U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Andras

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title. Docket: 3:20-cv-30007. Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

HHM v. Hayden — Palm Beach County

Public records show the eviction case was dismissed. The filing was made on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust.

Jones v. US Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 — Florida — Homeowner WINS: LSF9 Lacked Standing to Foreclose (2020)

A genuine homeowner standing win. Regina Jones prevailed at trial when the court granted her motion for involuntary dismissal at the close of U.S. Bank/LSF9's case, finding the Trust did not have standing to foreclose. The note was originally payable to Morrison Home Funding; an allonge purporting to transfer it to SunTrust (the original plaintiff U.S. Bank was substituted for) was executed by a SunTrust 'warehouse line operations supervisor' under a power of attorney for Morrison that SunTrust could not prove it held — a broken chain of authority. The appeal concerned only Jones's effort to recover attorney's fees under the mortgage's prevailing-party clause, implicating a split among Florida DCAs over fees when a defendant wins on the plaintiff's lack of standing. The underlying result stands: LSF9's foreclosure failed for want of standing.

Class Action Lawsuit — Federal Court — LSF9, US Bank Trust, Caliber Home Loans, Select Portfolio Servicing

A federal class-action complaint names Select Portfolio Servicing (SPS), U.S. Bank Trust as Trustee for the LSF9 Master Participation Trust, and Caliber Home Loans as defendants, alleging systemic problems in how the LSF9 trust and its servicers pursued foreclosures. It is part of a documented body of homeowner litigation (alongside the Washington Peterson/John cases, the Ameral Massachusetts filings, and the BP Investigative Agency 'straw man' analysis) contending that the LSF9 structure — U.S. Bank as nominal trustee, Caliber/SPS as servicers, with the trust itself claiming to be the note owner — is used to foreclose without a clear, provable chain of ownership. Documented as an existing complaint; specific class-certification outcome not asserted here pending direct docket verification.

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. CAMPO, ESQ

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00573. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. CHAN

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:19-cv-00541. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. LALIBERTY

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00535. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. WITCHLEY

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00519. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

SCRIPNICENCU v. LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST

Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-05280. Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

Katsenes v. U.S. Bank Trust N.A. — D. Massachusetts (LSF9 — Active)

Case No. 1:19-cv-12112 filed October 2019 in the District of Massachusetts. Diversity jurisdiction. U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust is a named defendant in a Massachusetts federal real property action. The court denied Katsenes' partial motion for summary judgment and allowed U.S. Bank's motion for summary judgment as to Count I to the extent of equitable subrogation — granting equitable subrogation in the amount of $334,738.90. Assigned to Judge Denise J. Casper. This is a Massachusetts federal case involving the same LSF9 trust entity currently evicting Section 8 tenants in Northeast Housing Court.

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. FITZGERALD

Docket: 1:19-cv-00443. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

Morgan v. Caliber Home Loans Inc.

Cause: 12:2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans. Docket: 8:19-cv-02797. Court: District Court, D. Maryland. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Hudson Advisors" "Master Participation".

Charles v. Caliber Home Loans

Cause: 88:8888 Other Statutory Actions. Docket: 4:19-cv-03359. Court: District Court, S.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

King v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1332nr Diversity-Notice of Removal. Docket: 3:19-cv-01689. Court: District Court, S.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Clarizio v. U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER

Docket: 9:19-ap-01048. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Iroh v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust, incorrectly named U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract. Docket: 4:19-cv-02689. Court: District Court, S.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Weiss et al v. Hudson Homes Management LLC — US District Court Oregon (6:2019cv01104)

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. CAMPO

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:19-cv-00337. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. NORMAN

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00335. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. BERRY

Docket: 2:19-cv-00327. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

Garcia v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., As Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 7:19-cv-00235. Court: District Court, S.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. FRAZEE

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:19-cv-00309. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. CUNNINGHAM

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00306. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. PIVERONAS

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00295. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

Bryant v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1441 Notice of Removal. Docket: 4:19-cv-02075. Court: District Court, S.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. MANETTI

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00249. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. BOSSE

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:19-cv-00236. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. SMITH

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00219. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF11 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. EASTMAN

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00211. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF11 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. COTE

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00205. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. ST PIERRE

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00194. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. WILLIAMS

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:19-cv-00192. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. PELLETIER

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00150. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. GRINDLE

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00136. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF10 Master Participation Trust v. Rago

Docket: 1:19-cv-10584. Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF10".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. SHIMKO

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:19-cv-00123. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 v. King — Federal Court Maine (1:19-cv-00119)

U.S. Bank Trust as Trustee for LSF9 filed a residential foreclosure action against Greg A. King in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine (1:19-cv-00119), attaching a chain of assignments — note and mortgage, an assignment into Wells Fargo, a quitclaim assignment, and an assignment into U.S. Bank, plus 2016 and 2017 loan modifications. King, appearing pro se, filed a 'Silver Surety Bond' rather than a compliant answer; the magistrate ordered a proper answer under threat of default. After a bench trial on Sept. 9, 2021, Judge Jon D. Levy issued findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered a judgment of foreclosure and sale for LSF9 on Sept. 27, 2021. King filed a notice of appeal. The multi-step assignment chain (originator → Wells Fargo → quitclaim → U.S. Bank as LSF9 trustee) is the same layered securitization structure documented across the LSF trust family.

US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 v. Holloway et al — Federal Court Maine (D. Me. 2:19-cv-00116)

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. TURNER

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:19-cv-00087. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

US BANK TRUST NA AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF10 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST v. GENO

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Docket: 1:19-cv-00053. Court: District Court, D. Maine. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF10 Master Participation Trust".

LSF8 Master Participation Trust v. Marusak

Docket: 19-08001. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Kaviani v. Caliber Home Loans Inc.

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal. Docket: 2:19-cv-00111. Court: District Court, D. Nevada. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Vandor v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF10 Master

Docket: 19-90003. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF10".

LSF 8 Master Participation Trust v. Stokes

Cause: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act. Docket: 9:19-cv-00011. Court: District Court, D. Montana. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Lone Star" "Master Participation Trust".

LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Tatten

Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act. Docket: 1:19-cv-00039. Court: District Court, D. Colorado. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 v. Moore — Federal Court Maine — Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale

U.S. Bank Trust N.A. v. Dick — Florida 2d DCA (2021) — LPOA Challenged at Trial

Case No. 2D19-3998. The trial court granted homeowner Dick's motion for involuntary dismissal finding U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 lacked standing. Caliber Home Loans sent a witness to testify on behalf of LSF9. Dick cross-examined using a Securitization Servicing Agreement showing the note may have been transferred to a different trust (VOLT). The trial court dismissed. On appeal, the Florida Second District reversed, finding that under the involuntary dismissal standard the movant must admit all facts in evidence favorable to the non-moving party — and under that standard the assignments and power of attorney were sufficient. NOTE: The reversal does not validate the LPOA — it reflects the procedural standard for involuntary dismissal motions, not a substantive ruling that the LPOA was authentic or sufficient. The trial court's concern about Caliber testifying for U.S. Bank Trust N.A. — and the VOLT trust discrepancy raised on cross — remain documented patterns.

US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 v. John — Washington State — Standing Challenge, Fraud on Court Alleged

A Washington homeowner (John) challenged an LSF9 foreclosure on standing and fraud-on-the-court grounds, represented in filings that document a recurring contradiction in the LSF9/Caliber structure: U.S. Bank claims to be the 'Trustee' and Caliber the 'Servicer' to prosecute the foreclosure, but when served with a subpoena the same entities argued they were 'non-parties' who could not be compelled to produce records. Foreclosure analyst William Paatalo's declarations in related Washington cases question whether the attorneys who filed had any retainer authority from the named trust at all. The filing situates the case within a wider Washington pattern (Peterson, Plumb) of homeowners contesting whether the LSF9 trust and its servicer actually hold enforceable authority — the same 'prove you own it / prove your agency' defect documented in Ohio, Oregon, and Massachusetts.

Marusak v. LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 6:18-cv-00405. Court: District Court, E.D. Oklahoma. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as trustee for LSF9 master v. Lee

Docket: 2:18-ap-01373. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Wilder v. Caliber Home Loans Inc

Cause: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s). Docket: 3:18-cv-03010. Court: District Court, N.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Greco v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal. Docket: 4:18-cv-00671. Court: District Court, E.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

U.S. Bank Trust N.A., as Trustee for LSF10 Master Participation Trust v. Maxwell

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title. Docket: 1:18-cv-11722. Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF10".

LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Tucker

Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question. Docket: 1:18-cv-01245. Court: District Court, D. Delaware. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Filgueira

Cause: 12:191 Bank Foreclosure. Docket: 4:18-cv-02776. Court: District Court, S.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Carter v. Caliber Home Loans Inc

Cause: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure. Docket: 3:18-cv-00920. Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master v. DaConceicao

Docket: 18-01074. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Hale v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. As Trustees for LSF9 Master

Docket: 2:18-ap-01198. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Bristol v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for the LSF9 Mast

Docket: 18-00193. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master v. Bates

Docket: 18-01060. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

Estate of Philomena Thomas through Phyllis Francis David as v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question. Docket: 1:18-cv-01771. Court: District Court, E.D. New York. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Zangara v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust — New Mexico Supreme Court (2024)

Bank of America filed a foreclosure action in 2011 on a $2.3 million loan, later dismissed for lack of prosecution in 2013. BOA then sold the note to LSF9 Master Participation Trust. LSF9 filed its own foreclosure in 2018, which was dismissed for lack of standing. LSF9 then filed a second foreclosure invoking New Mexico's six-month savings statute. The district court dismissed again, finding the statute inapplicable. The Court of Appeals ruled for LSF9. The New Mexico Supreme Court then clarified that a dismissal for lack of standing does not constitute 'negligence in prosecution' under the savings statute — meaning the savings statute remains available. The 2018 dismissal for lack of standing is documented as a clean pattern entry: LSF9 challenged on standing, dismissed. Case: S-1-SC-39679.

Zangara v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust — New Mexico Supreme Court (S-1-SC-39679-0) — First Dismissal for Standing, Second Action Allowed (2024)

The Zangaras defaulted on a $2.3 million mortgage. Bank of America filed a 2011 foreclosure dismissed in 2013 for lack of prosecution, then sold the note to LSF9 Master Participation Trust. LSF9's 2018 foreclosure was dismissed for lack of standing; LSF9 refiled, invoking New Mexico's six-month savings statute. The district court rejected the refile (calling the first action a 'nullity'), but on appeal the New Mexico Supreme Court held in 2024-NMSC-021 (No. S-1-SC-39679, Aug 1, 2024) that a dismissal for lack of standing is NOT 'negligence in prosecution,' so the savings statute applied and LSF9 could proceed. The decision overruled prior precedent (Barbeau v. Hoppenrath). Documented honestly: this is a case where LSF9's initial standing defect appeared (as in Ohio, Florida, Oregon), but the state's highest court gave the Trust a procedural path to refile — a reminder that standing dismissals are often 'without prejudice' and that the defect must be raised each time.

LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Rosetsky, N. — CourtListener

US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 v. Ricci — Federal Court Maine (1:18-cv-00473)

Farrington v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master

Docket: 17-01775. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

King v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1391 Personal Injury. Docket: 9:17-cv-00172. Court: District Court, D. Montana. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

Seiler v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1983. Docket: 1:17-cv-02882. Court: District Court, D. Colorado. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

Ramirez v. Caliber Home Loans

Docket: 17-02222. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master v. Smith

Docket: 17-00325. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "U.S. Bank Trust" "LSF9".

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust v. Hobson

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment. Docket: 1:17-cv-00362. Court: District Court, D. Rhode Island. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Trently v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 17-50939. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Seiler

Cause: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure. Docket: 1:17-cv-01512. Court: District Court, D. Colorado. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF9 Master Participation Trust".

Robert K. Ruegsegger v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 42:1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclosure Sale. Docket: 8:17-cv-00907. Court: District Court, C.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Lone Star" "Master Participation Trust".

WILLIFORD v. LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument. Docket: 2:17-cv-01516. Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Smith v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 1:17-cv-10326. Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Brosnahan v. Caliber Home Loans Incorporated

Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Docket: 3:16-cv-08277. Court: District Court, D. Arizona. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Lone Star" "Master Participation Trust".

FELICIANO v. LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST

Docket: 2:16-cv-08432. Court: District Court, D. New Jersey. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

King v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Docket: 8:16-cv-03489. Court: District Court, D. Maryland. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Altenburg v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Docket: 1:16-cv-03374. Court: District Court, D. Maryland. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Hudson Advisors" "Master Participation".

Pastor v. LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 16-00263. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Newman v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 42:1475 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclosure Procedures. Docket: 3:16-cv-02053. Court: District Court, S.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Washington v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Docket: 1:16-cv-03948. Court: District Court, E.D. New York. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Lone Star" "Master Participation Trust".

SIGLER v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen. Docket: 5:16-cv-00717. Court: District Court, W.D. Texas. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Lone Star" "Master Participation Trust".

Bermudez v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 28:1331(a) Fed. Question: Real Property. Docket: 2:16-cv-01570. Court: District Court, E.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Garrison v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Docket: 6:16-cv-00978. Court: District Court, M.D. Florida. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Lone Star" "Master Participation Trust".

Holmes v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question. Docket: 7:16-cv-03344. Court: District Court, S.D. New York. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Tucker (Gregory & Karen) — Delaware Superior Court (N16L-03-181 EMD) — Summary Judgment for LSF9

On March 30, 2016, LSF9 Master Participation Trust filed a scire facias sur mortgage (in rem foreclosure) complaint in Delaware Superior Court over property at 1504 Goldeneye Court, New Castle (Mortgage Record 20080917-0062897; C.A. No. N16L-03-181 EMD, Judge Davis). The Tuckers, appearing pro se, claimed to be 'Aboriginal Indigenous Moorish-Americans' free from the court's jurisdiction under the Treaty of Morocco. The court rejected that defense — holding the Treaty of Peace and Friendship confers no immunity from U.S. civil jurisdiction — and, finding the Tuckers pleaded none of the recognized scire facias defenses, granted LSF9 summary judgment. A separate 2018 attempt to remove the matter to the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (1:18-cv-01245, Judge Connolly) was remanded, and the defendant's motion for reconsideration was denied October 30, 2019.

Faust, Sr. v. LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 16-00095. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Williams v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract. Docket: 2:16-cv-00179. Court: District Court, W.D. Washington. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Sobers v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Docket: 1:16-cv-00335. Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Huweih v. US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF9 — Northern District of California (3:16-cv-00421)

A California homeowner (Huweih) sued U.S. Bank Trust as trustee for LSF9 and related defendants in the Northern District of California (3:16-cv-00421). On Jan 30, 2017, Judge Maxine M. Chesney granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, affording the plaintiff leave to amend. Documented honestly: this is a borrower-plaintiff action against the LSF9 structure that was dismissed at the pleading stage. It reflects the well-known California barrier to pre-foreclosure borrower suits (Gomes/Jenkins/Yvanova line) — California's nonjudicial-foreclosure scheme generally bars borrowers from suing pre-foreclosure to challenge a foreclosing party's authority — which is why LSF9 standing challenges fare better as post-foreclosure wrongful-foreclosure claims or as defenses in judicial-foreclosure states (Ohio, Maine, Florida) than as affirmative California pre-foreclosure suits.

King Jr. v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust — Montana Bankruptcy Court (2:16-ap-00030)

David P. King, Jr. (debtor-plaintiff) sued LSF9 Master Participation Trust in Montana (Bankr. adversary AP 2:16-ap-00030; D. Mont. CV 17-172-M-DLC-JCL, Judge Christensen / Mag. Judge Lynch) seeking a declaratory judgment that LSF9 is NOT the holder of his promissory note and has no right to enforce the note or deed of trust. The record is a textbook ownership-confusion / straw-man story: King's loan originated with IndyMac Bank; after his 2008 default and 2011 bankruptcy, OneWest Bank asserted it was the secured creditor; in September 2016 King was told LSF9 had become the owner — while he had ALSO been told Fannie Mae held the note. Through the bankruptcy, OneWest and Fannie Mae DISAVOWED ownership, leaving LSF9 as the purported owner. King then documented TWO conflicting versions of the supposedly identical note (the OneWest copy lacking a loan number and originator endorsement; the LSF9 copy bearing a loan number and a 'Cathy Powers' IndyMac endorsement), and alleged violations of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1602(g) and 1641(g). LSF9 responded with a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings arguing the transaction documents established assignment to it; the magistrate granted King leave to file an amended complaint adding FDCPA (§§ 1692f(6), 1692k), negligent-misrepresentation, constructive-fraud, and unfair-practices claims. Documented as a homeowner's affirmative challenge exposing the 'who actually owns this note' defect — with rare documentary proof of multiple conflicting note versions.

Sadigursky v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust, Caliber Home Loans, DLJ Mortgage, Selene Finance — Western NY Bankruptcy (AP No. 16-1024 K)

In this Western District of New York bankruptcy adversary proceeding (Case No. 15-10034 K; AP No. 16-1024 K), the debtors (Sadigursky) challenged an LSF9 foreclosure, and defendants LSF9, Caliber Home Loans, DLJ Mortgage Capital, and Selene Finance moved to dismiss on Rooker-Feldman, collateral estoppel, and res judicata grounds. The debtors contended that 'GRP' acquired no rights capable of being passed to the defendants due to alleged errors and defects in the underlying foreclosure. The bankruptcy court sua sponte ABSTAINED under 11 U.S.C. § 305 in favor of the still-pending foreclosure action in New York Supreme Court, Kings County, and lifted the § 362 automatic stay so the state court could fully adjudicate all issues regarding the Brooklyn property — noting that the failure to complete the foreclosure 'suggests the possibility of a Zombie foreclosure.' Documented honestly: a procedural abstention, not a merits win, but notable for the court's own reference to a stalled 'zombie' foreclosure and the multi-servicer (Caliber/DLJ/Selene) LSF9 chain.

U.S. Bank Trust N.A. / LSF9 / Caliber — Florida — LPOA Rejected by Court, Case Involuntarily Dismissed (2017)

Attorney Michelle Belmont, Esq. challenged the validity of the LPOA at trial in a Florida foreclosure where U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust had been substituted in as plaintiff, with Caliber sending its witness. Though the note, mortgage, assignment and most other documents were stipulated to prior to trial, Belmont attacked the LPOA. The court rejected the LPOA and dismissed the case involuntarily. The judge specifically noted the fatal strategy of bringing a Caliber witness when the plaintiff had become U.S. Bank Trust N.A. — stating from the bench: 'Where's the witness from U.S. Bank?' The court recognized the witness could not authenticate the LPOA without a sponsoring witness from the actual named principal. This is the foundational case documenting that courts will refuse to admit the LSF9 LPOA without proper authentication from U.S. Bank itself — a principle directly applicable to HHM's use of the same Florida-recorded LPOA in Massachusetts Housing Court (Docket No. [MA docket]). Documented by Bill Paatalo, BP Investigative Agency.

Clockedile v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal. Docket: 4:15-cv-14222. Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Elizabeth Ng v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 28:1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure. Docket: 2:15-cv-08042. Court: District Court, C.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Thompson v. LSF8 Master Participation Trust

Docket: 15-02184. Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST BY CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. v. DOUGHERTY

Cause: 28:1446 Notice of Removal. Docket: 2:15-cv-05005. Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "LSF8 Master Participation Trust".

Mary Richard v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Cause: 28:1441 Notice of Removal. Docket: 2:13-cv-09236. Court: District Court, C.D. California. Source: CourtListener/PACER. Query: "Caliber Home Loans" eviction foreclosure.

Republic of Korea v. Lone Star Funds

A South Korean court found Lone Star Funds and executive Paul Yoo guilty of stock price manipulation in the acquisition of Korea Exchange Bank. Paul Yoo was sentenced to 3 years imprisonment. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction in 2011.

Hudson Homes Management LLC v. Khamphong Manyvongsa

Eviction action filed by Hudson Homes Management LLC. Identified via Trellis.law public records. Full jurisdiction and outcome details pending verification.

Hudson Advisors Own Website: 717 Professionals — Down From 894 on LinkedIn and 900 Previously Claimed

Hudson Advisors' own website (The Hudson Platform page, accessed June 2026) states '717 professionals across 10 offices.' LinkedIn shows 894 employees. Previous HHM marketing materials claimed 900 employees. The Hudson Platform page also states '$279.4 billion in approximate aggregate purchase price' — down from $777.3B previously reported. The current SEC Form ADV (March 31, 2026) reports AUM of $36.4 billion.

hudson-advisors.com/hudson-platform/ (June 2026) ↗

Hudson Advisors Has Underwritten $70.6B in Credit, $36.2B Managed — Residential Mortgage Strategy Continues in 2026

According to Hudson Advisors' current website (June 2026): Since 2014, Hudson has underwritten approximately $70.6 billion in credit opportunities and managed approximately $36.2 billion in assets. Hudson supports Lone Star's residential credit strategy which focuses on newly originated, performing non-Agency residential mortgages in the U.S. — the same mortgage type as LSF9. Hudson's credit operations include detailed loan-level underwriting, borrower credit analysis, collateral valuation, and cash flow modeling.

Hudson Advisors Website (June 2026) ↗

ROAD Act CORRECTION (May 28, 2026): House KEPT Institutional Investor BAN — Only Removed Forced Divestiture — Now Back to Senate

CORRECTION to prior entry: The House version of the ROAD Act (passed 396-13, May 20, 2026) KEPT the institutional investor ban on new purchases. It removed only the 7-year forced-sale/divestiture requirement. Per Goodwin Law (May 28, 2026): 'The House Bill...retains the institutional investor prohibition in the Senate bill but departs from it in several other respects.' Per MAREI: 'The bill doesn't force you to sell anything you already own.' House version also adds a HUD DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT: large institutional investors must report annually to HUD exactly how many homes they own and city/state for any city where they own 10+. Bill returned to Senate for final reconciliation. Senate options: (1) pass House version as-is, (2) conference committee, (3) not vote.

Greenberg Traurig / NMP ↗

Hudson Advisors L.P. — Parent Company Liability Under Massachusetts Chapter 93A — $11.2M SEC Penalty on Record

Hudson Homes Management LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hudson Advisors L.P., the asset management arm of Lone Star Funds. Hudson Advisors paid $11.2 million in SEC civil penalties in 2022 for undisclosed fee allocation practices affecting 14 investment funds over 13 years (SEC Release No. 2022-159). Hudson Advisors' own public website describes HHM's disposition and exit execution functions as Hudson Advisors services — not independent HHM operational decisions. A Glassdoor employee review disclosed the coordinated termination of over 3,000 leases to return real estate assets to the trust for sale, consistent with Hudson Advisors' corporate disclosure of a portfolio reduction from 61 markets to 40 markets. HHM generates approximately $15 million in annual revenue on 3,559 properties. Multiple Glassdoor reviews from 2025 and 2026 question whether the company will continue to exist.

SEC Release No. 2022-159 / Hudson Advisors Corporate Disclosures ↗

HHM Massachusetts Eviction Practice — Multiple Attorney Withdrawals Documented — Barton & Gilman No Longer Represents HHM

Public dockets from the Northeast Housing Court document that Hudson Homes Management LLC cycled through multiple attorneys in a single Massachusetts summary process eviction matter in 2025–2026. Barton & Gilman, a Massachusetts law firm that previously handled HHM eviction proceedings, no longer represents HHM in eviction matters following the departure of the firm's eviction attorney. As of May 2026, HHM has retained a new law firm for Massachusetts eviction proceedings. The underlying eviction at issue involved three independent fatal legal defects that were raised by tenants through a Motion to Dismiss: a standing defect under Rental Property Management Services v. Hatcher, 479 Mass. 542 (2018); a federal good cause defect under 24 CFR §982.310(d) for Section 8 tenancies; and a VAWA disclosure defect under 34 U.S.C. §12491. The eviction was dismissed.

Northeast Housing Court Public Docket ↗

Lone Star Sells 458-Unit Texas Apartment Complex — 3 Days Ago — While HHM Tenants Document Ongoing Neglect

On May 21, 2026 — three days ago — Lone Star Funds completed the sale of Reserve at Spring Creek, a 458-unit multifamily community in Richardson, Texas to MG Properties. The property was acquired as part of Lone Star Value-Add Fund I. Jerome Foulon, Global Head of Commercial Real Estate, stated it represented an opportunity to invest in a well-located multifamily asset. Lone Star now has $96 billion in aggregate capital commitments across 26 private equity funds established since 1995.

Business Wire / Las Vegas Sun ↗

Boston Globe: Warren Housing Bill Passes — Private Equity Not Welcome in Single-Family Market

The Boston Globe published coverage on May 21, 2026 of the progress of Warren and Scott housing legislation. Warren was quoted stating the bill was built on the belief that homes are for families, not investment vehicles for Wall Street private equity. The bill that passed the Senate included requirements for institutional investors to divest single-family rentals after 7 years with a right of first refusal for individual buyers.

Boston Globe ↗

ROAD Act Conference — HHM Must Divest 3,559 Homes — Unresolved Tenant Litigation Follows the Assets

The House passed the ROAD Act 396-13 on May 20, 2026. The Senate passed it 89-10 on March 12, 2026. Both versions are in conference as of May 27, 2026. Under the Senate version — which has White House support — institutional investors with 350 or more single-family units must divest all single-family rentals within 7 years, with a federally mandated right of first refusal to current tenants and local governments. Hudson Homes Management LLC controls approximately 3,559 homes across 40 U.S. markets. Under standard real estate transaction principles, unresolved tenant litigation — including consumer protection claims, federal housing law violations, and security deposit disputes — attaches to individual properties and must be disclosed or resolved before clean title transfers. HHM's parent company, Hudson Advisors L.P., remains potentially liable as the wholly-owned parent regardless of any portfolio divestiture.

U.S. Congress / Boston Globe ↗

House Passes ROAD Act 396-13 — Two Days Ago — HHM Must Divest All Single-Family Rentals

The House of Representatives passed the housing affordability bill 396-13 on May 20, 2026 — two days ago. The bill includes restrictions on institutional investors buying single-family homes. House and Senate versions are now in conference. Under the Senate version which has White House support, institutional investors with 350+ homes must divest all single-family rentals to individual buyers within 7 years. CNN reported: Together, the House and Senate proposals signal that Washington is treating Americas housing affordability crisis with new urgency.

CNN / Boston Globe ↗

ROAD Act House Version: Federal Renter Hotline + HUD Annual Disclosure Required Within 180 Days of Enactment

The House version of the ROAD Act (May 20, 2026, 396-13) contains two provisions not widely covered: (1) RENTER OUTREACH RESOURCE: Within 180 days of enactment, the federal government must establish a toll-free telephone number and public website for renters of large institutional investor properties to report disputes to federal agencies. (2) HUD ANNUAL DISCLOSURE: Large institutional investors must report to HUD by December 31 each year how many single-family homes they own, and the city/state for every city where they own 10 or more homes. These disclosures are public record.

Goodwin Law (May 28, 2026) / Bipartisan Policy Center ↗

HHM Was a Sponsor at IMN Single Family Rental East Conference — Miami Beach, May 18-20, 2026

Hudson Homes Management was listed as a sponsor and exhibitor at the IMN Single Family Rental East 2026 conference at Loews Miami Beach, May 18-20, 2026 — just three weeks before this archive entry. HHM was publicly representing itself as an active institutional single-family rental operator to industry peers despite documented portfolio wind-down, layoff discussions, and shrinkage from 61 to ~40 markets.

IMN Single Family Rental East 2026 — Sponsor Profile ↗

HHM Website Still Claims 61 Markets and 250+ Employees — Contradicts Documented Wind-Down to 40 Markets

As of May 2026, HHM's own About Us page and LinkedIn profile still state the company operates in 61 markets with over 250 full-time employees. Business intelligence data shows HHM has shrunk to 40 markets with 101-200 employees. Glassdoor employees state the company may not exist in 2026. The company's public-facing claims directly contradict documented internal realities. Prospective tenants signing leases in 2026 are being presented with materially inaccurate information about company scale and stability.

HudsonHomesManagement.com / LinkedIn ↗

Northeast Housing Court — HHM Evictions Dismissed on VAWA Grounds — Pattern of Federal Non-Compliance Documented (2025–2026)

Public dockets at masscourts.org document multiple dismissals of eviction filings by Hudson Homes Management LLC in the Northeast Housing Court on VAWA grounds between 2025 and 2026. In each case, HHM filed summary process evictions against Section 8 tenants without attaching the federally mandated VAWA Notice of Occupancy Rights form required under 34 U.S.C. §12491. HUD issued updated VAWA compliance forms and guidance in 2025, reinforcing that VAWA disclosure is an active regulatory compliance requirement for all landlords accepting federal housing assistance. The Massachusetts eviction record sealing law (G.L. c. 239 §16, effective May 5, 2025) provides that dismissed eviction records seal immediately, with no waiting period, permanently prohibiting consumer reporting agencies from including sealed records in tenant screening reports.

Northeast Housing Court Public Docket ↗

HHM Still Actively Listing Properties in Texas — $2,065-$2,520/Month — Despite Wind-Down Pattern

As of May 2026, Hudson Homes Management is actively listing at least 7 properties for rent in Texas through RateMyAgent, including: 8803 Spinning Mill Drive (Sienna Plantation TX, $2,520/month, 4bd/3ba); 3646 Clipper Winds Way (Houston TX, $2,065/month, 3bd/2ba); 953 Texas Timbers Drive (Katy TX, $2,100/month, 4bd/2ba); 130 Kinnerly Peak Place. Despite shrinking from 61 to 40 markets and insider predictions the company may not exist in 2026, HHM continues to sign new leases in Texas.

RateMyAgent ↗

MA Housing Court Dismissal — HHM VAWA Non-Compliance — Northeast Housing Court (2026)

The Northeast Housing Court dismissed an eviction filed by Hudson Homes Management LLC on VAWA grounds in 2026. According to the public docket at masscourts.org, HHM failed to provide the federally mandated VAWA Notice of Occupancy Rights form required under 34 U.S.C. §12491 — a known, active compliance requirement that HUD reinforced with updated guidance in 2025. The court did not need to reach two additional independent legal defects present in the filing: a standing defect under Rental Property Management Services v. Hatcher, 479 Mass. 542 (2018), arising from a discrepancy between the named lessor on the original lease and the entity filing the eviction; and a federal good cause defect under 24 CFR §982.310(d) applicable to Section 8 tenancies. The eviction record was sealed immediately upon dismissal under G.L. c. 239 §16.

Massachusetts Trial Court ↗

Lone Star Acquires RadiciGroup (European Chemical Company) + DOMO Materials — May 2026

In May 2026, Lone Star completed acquisitions of both RadiciGroup (high-performance polymers and specialty chemicals, Bergamo Italy) and DOMO Engineered Materials. CEO Donald Quintin described RadiciGroup as well-positioned with broad development, manufacturing and technological capabilities. These transactions bring Lone Star's total to 32 acquisitions across 14 countries and $96 billion in capital commitments.

Business Wire / Yahoo Finance ↗

Novo Banco Sale Completed TODAY — €6.7 Billion ($7.7B). Lone Star Profit: €4.8B+

Per BusinessWire and The Portugal Post (April 30, 2026), Lone Star completed the sale of Portuguese bank Novo Banco to French banking group BPCE for a final price of €6.7 billion. Lone Star invested €1 billion when it acquired a 75% stake in 2017. The profit exceeds €4.8 billion. CEO Donald Quintin called it the successful culmination of our investment. Police raids were conducted on Novo Banco headquarters in October 2025 over suspected crimes in toxic asset sales. Portuguese newspaper Publico reported executives stood to receive €1.1 billion in bonuses, prompting employee protests.

The Portugal Post / BusinessWire ↗

Lone Star Buys Foreclosed WeWork SF HQ for $216M — Then Adds Roof Deck & Tenant Lounge While HHM Tenants Have No Heat

Lone Star Funds acquired 600 California Street in San Francisco — WeWork's former headquarters — via a credit bid of $216 million after a foreclosure auction found zero competing bids. The 360,000-square-foot building was appraised at $109 million in 2024, a 70% drop from its $322.8 million purchase price in 2019. Lone Star then formed a joint venture with Harvest Properties to renovate the building — adding a roof deck, fitness center, tenant lounge, and flexible meeting spaces. The building is largely vacant with 246,000 square feet available.

The Real Deal / Commercial Property Executive ↗

600 California Street Foreclosure — Zero Bids at Auction

According to The Real Deal, Lone Star Funds took ownership of 600 California Street in San Francisco — a 360,000 sq ft, 20-story office tower formerly serving as WeWork's SF headquarters — after a public foreclosure auction drew no other bids.

The Real Deal ↗

Hudson Advisors Form ADV Filed March 31, 2026 — AUM: $36.4 Billion — 894 Employees

Hudson Advisors L.P. filed its annual Form ADV with the SEC on March 31, 2026. Reported AUM: $36,393,091,515 ($36.4 billion). The firm employs 894 professionals globally. Offices in Dallas, Dublin, Frankfurt, Lisbon, London, Luxembourg, Madrid, New York, Paris, São Paulo, and Tokyo. CRD No. 156078.

SEC Form ADV — CRD No. 156078 (March 31, 2026) ↗

Lone Star Raises $1 Billion New Mortgage Fund While HHM Tenants Cannot Get Maintenance (March 2026)

On March 18, 2026 — six weeks before the Massachusetts Housing Court dismissed HHM's defective VAWA eviction — Lone Star announced the final closing of Residential Mortgage Fund IV, raising over $1 billion for new non-agency mortgages with $10 billion+ in buying power. CEO Donald Quintin stated Lone Star has been supporting the U.S. housing market for over a decade, having purchased more than $20 billion in unpaid principal balance across more than 40,000 individual mortgages. The fund invests in mortgages that fall outside government-backed agency lending rules.

Bloomberg Law / Lone Star Funds ↗

HHM Actively Selling Texas Properties — The Woodlands and Conroe TX Sales Confirmed 2025-2026

HAR.com (Houston Association of Realtors) confirms HHM selling Texas properties: sold 03/17/2026 (active), sold 01/16/2026 in The Woodlands TX ($325K-$370K, 4BR/2BA, 2,026 sqft), sold 07/10/2025 in Conroe TX ($250K-$285K, 3BR/2BA, 1,634 sqft). HHM is listed as representing the seller in all transactions.

HAR.com — Houston Association of Realtors (2026) ↗

Warren After Senate 89-10 Vote: 'More Than 40 Provisions, All Pushing to Bring Down Housing Costs'

After the Senate passed ROAD Act 89-10, Warren stated: 'Every provision in this bill, and there are more than 40 of them, push in exactly the same direction — different ways to help bring down the cost of building more housing.' Warren personally co-authored the institutional investor provision targeting companies like Lone Star/HHM.

Time Magazine / Senate Banking Committee ↗

Senate Passes 21st Century ROAD Act 89-10 — Bans Institutional Investors Like HHM from Buying Single-Family Homes

On March 12, 2026, the U.S. Senate passed the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act by 89-10 — the largest bipartisan housing bill in decades. Co-sponsored by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), the bill includes Section 901 which prohibits institutional investors controlling 350 or more single-family units from purchasing additional single-family homes. Lone Star Funds through Hudson Homes Management currently manages 3,559 homes — more than 10 times the 350-unit threshold. Under the bill, HHM would be required to divest all single-family rentals to individual homebuyers within 7 years. Warren stated: We put this bill together with the deep-seated belief that it is families who should live in homes. They are not there simply as investment vehicles for Wall Street private equity.

NPR / Baker Botts / Wikipedia ↗

$3 Billion Acquisition of Lonza Capsules & Health Ingredients Division

Per BusinessWire (March 6, 2026), Lone Star Fund XII entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Capsules and Health Ingredients division of Lonza Group AG for an enterprise value of CHF 2.3 billion ($3 billion). Lonza retains a 40% equity position. CEO Donald Quintin quoted: We see significant opportunity for CHI as a standalone business. Per Bloomberg (April 23, 2026), Goldman Sachs and Jefferies are arranging $1.75 billion in debt financing for the deal.

BusinessWire ↗

Lone Star Funds Bidding to Acquire Irish Bank Permanent TSB (March 2026)

In March 2026, Lone Star was reported as one of several private equity firms in the running to acquire Permanent TSB (PTSB), an Irish bank. This follows Lone Stars completed sale of Novo Banco for 6.7 billion euros in April 2026 and demonstrates continued aggressive global acquisition activity while Hudson Homes Management tenants in the US face maintenance failures and predatory fees.

Wikipedia / Financial Press ↗

Senator Warren Corporate Landlord Investigation — Lone Star Not Included

According to Axios, Senator Elizabeth Warren sent letters to 14 corporate landlords including Blackstone, Starwood, and Invitation Homes, requesting data on properties owned, rents charged, evictions conducted, and complaints. Lone Star Funds was not among the 14 despite operating in 61 U.S. markets through Hudson Homes Management LLC.

Axios ↗

COLT Securitization Platform — $21 Billion Cumulative Issuance

Per SEC EDGAR filings and Alternatives Watch, Lone Star has issued 68 COLT securitizations with cumulative issuance of $21 billion since 2015. COLT 2026-1 ($385M, January) and COLT 2026-2 ($328M, March) are the most recent deals. Over 200 bond investors participate in the platform.

Alternatives Watch / SEC EDGAR ↗

Lone Star Residential Mortgage Fund IV — Final Close ($1B+)

Per BusinessWire press release, Lone Star announced final close of LSRMF IV at over $1 billion in committed capital, providing ability to invest in over $10 billion of mortgage loans. CEO Donald Quintin quoted. Across all residential funds, Lone Star has purchased over $20 billion in unpaid principal balance across 40,000+ individual mortgages nationwide.

BusinessWire ↗

Connecticut Precedent: Congressman Requests Federal HUD Investigation into Corporate Landlord for Heating Failures (Feb 2026)

Congressman John Larson (CT-01) formally requested a federal HUD investigation into JRK Property Holdings on February 6, 2026, after hundreds of tenants at Concierge Apartments in Rocky Hill were evacuated due to broken heating and hot water systems, burst pipes, flooding, and a failed fire suppression system. Larson gave HUD Secretary Scott Turner seven days to respond. The Connecticut AG had already been probing JRK's failures. This precedent directly establishes that federal HUD investigations into corporate landlords for habitability failures are ongoing and politically supported.

Congressman Larson Press Release ↗

Lone Star Principal Office Now Listed as London, UK — Not Dallas

Per the Marathon Asset Management press release on BusinessWire (February 18, 2026), Lone Star is described as a leading investment firm with its principal office in London, UK. This contradicts prior public descriptions listing Dallas, Texas as the headquarters. The change aligns with founder John Grayken's London residence and Irish citizenship (renounced U.S. citizenship in 1999).

BusinessWire ↗

$235 Million Florida Senior Housing Portfolio Refinance — 10 Properties in Tampa, Boca Raton, Sarasota, Naples

Per BusinessWire and Multi-Housing News, Lone Star Real Estate Fund VI received a $235 million senior mortgage loan from Marathon Asset Management to refinance an 11-property, 1,564-unit senior housing portfolio. Ten properties are in Florida primary markets including Tampa, Boca Raton, Sarasota, and Naples. One property is in Dallas-Fort Worth. Originally purchased in 2021 for $334 million from Healthpeak Properties. Operated by Discovery Senior Living.

Multi-Housing News / BusinessWire ↗

Rice University Kinder Institute — Institutional SFR Investors Own 11,000 Harris County Homes (2024)

According to the Kinder Institute for Urban Research at Rice University (January 2026), nine large institutional investors owned approximately 11,000 single-family residential properties in Harris County in 2024 — representing about 1% of homes in the area. The analysis used property records and a keyword methodology developed by Rutgers University professor Eric Seymour to link 370 unique owner names to the nine firms. The analysis notes it likely misses some properties linked to entities not on the keyword list. Key findings: Pretium (Progress Residential) holds the largest footprint at 3,300 properties; concentrations of institutional ownership are in the northern and western suburbs; companies have slightly increased holdings since 2021 despite rising interest rates.

Kinder Institute for Urban Research, Rice University ↗

Trump Executive Order 14376: 'Stopping Wall Street from Competing with Main Street Homebuyers' — January 20, 2026

On his first day in office, President Trump signed Executive Order 14376 — 'Stopping Wall Street from Competing with Main Street Homebuyers' — directing federal agencies to issue guidance limiting institutional investor purchases of single-family homes. The EO preceded and catalyzed the ROAD Act legislation. Combined with the bipartisan Senate vote (89-10) and House vote (396-13), the institutional investor ban has support from the White House, the Senate, and the House.

Allen Matkins / Greenberg Traurig (April 2026) ↗

Families First Housing Act — Give Families Priority Over Institutional Investors on Foreclosed HUD Homes (Jan 2026)

Congressman Pat Harrigan (NC-10) introduced the Families First Housing Act on January 8, 2026, aimed at giving American families priority access to federally backed foreclosed single-family homes before large investors and hedge funds can purchase them. This legislation directly targets the mechanism by which Lone Star Funds acquired distressed mortgages — including LSF9 — by purchasing HUD distressed loan packages (17,000+ mortgages) before individual buyers could access them.

Congressman Pat Harrigan Press Release ↗

Hudson Advisors Corporate Disclosure — Portfolio Reduced to 3,559 Homes in 40 Markets (Down from 61)

According to the Hudson Advisors corporate website (hudson-advisors.com/service/real-estate/), the current disclosure states: 'Today, Hudson Homes manages approximately 3,559 homes across 40 markets nationwide.' This compares to the earlier disclosed figure of 61 markets. The reduction from 61 markets to 40 markets and the specific home count of 3,559 confirms an active portfolio reduction. Hudson Advisors describes HHM as providing 'acquisition, renovation, leasing, property management and disposition under one roof' — disposition being the mechanism through which assets are returned to the trust for sale.

Hudson Advisors Corporate Website ↗

Glassdoor: Only 41% of HHM Employees Would Recommend — Layoff Questions Dominate 2026 Reviews

As of 2026, Hudson Homes Management has a 3.4/5 Glassdoor rating across 59 reviews. Only 41% of employees would recommend working there to a friend. Employees rate company culture 3.2/5 and career opportunities 3.0/5. The most searched Glassdoor question about HHM in 2026 is about layoffs. Employees describe favoritism, no room for growth, inconsistent company, public shaming in meetings, and leadership that has spent their entire career in an Excel file. One review states this company may not exist in 2026.

Glassdoor ↗

Lone Star Funds — Private Equity Fund Lifecycle: Acquire, Operate, Exit

Per Lone Star's own website, the firm has organized 25 funds with aggregate capital commitments of approximately $95 billion since 1995. Private equity funds operate on fixed lifecycles — capital is raised, deployed, and then returned to investors through asset dispositions. Per Hudson Advisors' website, their services explicitly include 'Exit Planning & Execution' covering 'portfolio sales, securitizations and recapitalizations.' The HSFRF (Hudson Star Family Rental Fund) entities documented in court records — HSFRF 2, HSFRF 3, and HSFRF 4 — follow the same naming convention as Lone Star's fund series (LSF9, LSF10), suggesting a structured fund vehicle for the single-family rental portfolio with a defined investment horizon. Lone Star has publicly announced portfolio dispositions in other asset classes, including the November 2025 sale of three Texas multifamily properties through Lone Star Real Estate Fund VI.

Lone Star Funds Website / Hudson Advisors Website ↗

Trump Signs Executive Order Banning Large Institutional Investors from Single-Family Homes — Directly Targets HHM

President Trump signed an executive order banning large institutional investors from buying single-family homes. In his State of the Union address, Trump urged Congress to make the ban permanent, stating: I am asking Congress to make that ban permanent because homes for people — really, that is what we want. We want homes for people, not for corporations. The Senate subsequently codified this in the ROAD Act with bipartisan support.

White House / Fox News / NPR ↗

Hudson Advisors Website — Portfolio Reduced to 3,559 Homes in 40 Markets (Down from 61 Markets)

Per the Hudson Advisors website (retrieved March 2026): 'Today, Hudson Homes manages approximately 3,559 homes across 40 markets nationwide, providing acquisition, renovation, leasing, property management and disposition under one roof.' The same company's website had previously described operations across 61 U.S. markets. The reduction from 61 markets to 40 markets — a contraction of 21 markets — and a portfolio of approximately 3,559 homes represents a documented reduction in scale. The page explicitly lists 'Exit Planning & Execution' as a Hudson Advisors service, describing it as: 'Hudson supports disposition strategies for real estate investments, preparing assets for sale, coordinating marketing and buyer diligence, negotiating transactions and structuring exits, including portfolio sales, securitizations and recapitalizations.'

Hudson Advisors L.P. — Official Website ↗

Hudson Advisors Corporate Disclosure — 'Disposition' and 'Exit Execution' as Explicit HHM Functions

According to the Hudson Advisors corporate website, the real estate page explicitly describes HHM's role as including 'disposition' alongside acquisition, renovation, leasing, and property management — 'under one roof.' The credit operations page states: 'Since 1995, Hudson has assisted Lone Star in the disposal or partial disposal of 149 asset-backed and structured credit investments acquired.' The platform page states Hudson 'manages the realization of investments through strategic sales, recapitalizations and public offerings' and 'coordinates diligence, transaction structuring and buyer engagement to support efficient, value-focused outcomes.' Hudson Advisors describes itself as focused on 'executing business plans to a defined timeframe, rather than timing the market.'

Hudson Advisors Corporate Website ↗

Lone Star Funds — Organizational Overview (Wikipedia)

The Wikipedia article on Lone Star Funds documents the firm's formation, global operations, South Korea proceedings (stock manipulation conviction upheld 2011), the ICSID arbitration and 2025 annulment, and the Hudson Advisors relationship. Wikipedia is a secondary source; this entry links to it as an accessible reference to the underlying sources, which include Forbes, Reuters, and Financial Times coverage cited therein.

Wikipedia ↗

Hudson Homes Management Now Reports 3,559 Homes Across 40 Markets — Down from 61

Per Hudson Advisors' own website (hudson-advisors.com, accessed April 2026), Hudson Homes Management now manages approximately 3,559 homes across 40 markets. Previous public disclosures referenced 61 U.S. markets. This represents a significant contraction in the company's stated market presence.

Hudson Advisors Website ↗

Glassdoor: Only 28% of HHM Employees Have Positive Business Outlook

According to Glassdoor, Hudson Homes Management has a 3.4/5 employee rating from 59 reviews. Only 41% of employees recommend working there. Only 28% have a positive business outlook. One reviewer stated: This company may not exist in 2026. Another noted senior management are all on completely separate pages at all times.

Glassdoor ↗

HUD Gutted Fair Housing Enforcement in 2025 — VAWA Violations Face Reduced Federal Oversight

The Nation reported in December 2025 that HUD under the Trump administration refused to enforce the Fair Housing Act and is preventing private organizations from doing so. Congress sent a letter to HUD Secretary Scott Turner in September 2025 demanding restoration of enforcement, noting that the largest-ever number of fair housing discrimination complaints was filed in 2023, that disability-based complaints were the largest category, and that domestic violence-related VAWA complaints had doubled from 2020-2021 and continued rising each year since.

The Nation / Congress ↗

SPX FLOW Sale — $4.775 Billion Profit on $3.8B Investment (3 Years)

Per Dallas Innovates (December 2025), Lone Star agreed to sell SPX FLOW to ITT Inc. for $4.775 billion. Lone Star acquired SPX FLOW in 2022 for $3.8 billion — generating nearly $1 billion in profit in approximately three years.

Dallas Innovates ↗

South Korea: Lone Star Convicted of Stock Manipulation — $216.5M ICSID Award Annulled for Wilful Criminal Conduct

Lone Star acquired 51% of Korea Exchange Bank for $1.15 billion in 2003 and sold it for $3.5 billion in 2012. Korean prosecutors convicted Lone Star of stock price manipulation of KEB Card. After the conviction, Lone Star filed a $4.68 billion ICSID claim against South Korea. In November 2025, the ICSID annulment committee voided the entire $216.5 million award, finding that the original tribunal had failed to properly account for Lone Stars criminal conduct. Korea PM Kim Min-seok stated the governments payment obligations were entirely nullified.

Korea Times / Steptoe / CNBC ↗

Lone Star Sells 606-Unit Texas Portfolio (Nov 2025) — Claiming Improved Resident Experience

On November 10, 2025, Lone Star sold a 606-unit multifamily portfolio across three Texas properties (Lubbock and Midland) acquired in 2022. Lone Star stated it implemented disciplined asset management strategies focused on targeted operational and physical improvements to strengthen occupancy and improve the overall resident experience. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Business Wire / Lone Star Funds ↗

ICSID Complete Annulment — South Korea v. Lone Star ($216.5M Eliminated)

According to KED Global, the ICSID annulment committee completely annulled the $216.5M award previously granted to Lone Star Funds, eliminating South Korea's entire compensation obligation. The tribunal cited Lone Star's wilful criminal conduct as a contributing factor. Lone Star's original claim was $4.68 billion.

Steptoe / KED Global / Arnold & Porter ↗

ICSID Annulment — South Korea Arbitration

According to KED Global reporting, an ICSID tribunal committee completely annulled a $216.5M arbitration award related to Lone Star's South Korean operations in November 2025.

Steptoe / KED Global / Arnold & Porter ↗

Police Raids on Novo Banco Headquarters — Suspected Crimes in Toxic Asset Sales

According to The Portugal Post, police raids were conducted on Novo Banco headquarters in October 2025 over suspected crimes related to toxic asset sales during Lone Star's ownership. The criminal investigation remains active as of April 2026. This occurred while Lone Star was in the process of selling the bank for €6.7 billion.

The Portugal Post ↗

Federal Civil Rights Case Filed Against HHM — W.D. New York (Sept. 2025) [DEVELOPING]

A federal civil case captioned Fair v. Hudson Homes Management LLC was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York on September 25, 2025. Case number: 1:25-cv-00932. As of the date of this entry, the case is active and has not been terminated. Court records confirm Hudson Homes Management LLC as the named defendant. The full complaint is available through the federal PACER system. The case was identified through CourtListener's federal docket database. This entry will be updated as additional case details become available through public court records.

CourtListener — W.D.N.Y. Docket 1:25-cv-00932 ↗

Texas Housers: 76,321 Evictions Filed in Harris County in 2024 — 1 in 10 Renter Households

According to the Texas Housers Harris County Eviction Case Dashboard (texashousers.org), landlords filed 76,321 eviction cases against Harris County residents in 2024 — approximately 1 filing for every 10 renter households in the county. Key findings include: areas with the highest eviction concentrations also had higher shares of renters of color; the top 30 evicting properties accounted for nearly 1 in every 13 evictions filed; one in three of the top-evicting properties is owned by a non-Texan company; and the median eviction case length was 24 days from filing to judgment. Every year since 2021, eviction filings in Harris County have exceeded pre-pandemic levels, averaging 30% higher than 2010-2019 levels.

Texas Housers / Harris County Eviction Case Dashboard ↗

€1.1 Billion Executive Bonus Pool — Employees Called It Greatest Injustice in Memory

According to Portuguese newspaper Publico (September 2025) and The Portugal Post, Lone Star executives and Novo Banco managers stood to receive bonuses totaling approximately €1.1 billion upon completion of the Novo Banco sale — paid by Lone Star, not the bank. The bank's 2,700 employees launched a petition demanding recognition for their role in the turnaround, describing the top-heavy payout as one of the greatest injustices in memory.

Publico (Portugal) / The Portugal Post ↗

HHM Reported $10,034 to Credit Bureaus — Agreed to Delete When Tenant Filed BBB Complaint (August 2025)

A BBB complaint filed in 2025 documents that HHM reported $10,034 to credit bureaus as of August 27, 2025. The tenant accepted the BBB resolution with the assurance that HHM would have the amount removed from credit as paid in full, or deleted as not owed, through their collection agency. The collection agency name was redacted by BBB. The tenant had paid a $2,195 security deposit and moved out in October 2025 after being charged $575 for alleged damages including ozone treatment and carpet cleaning for pre-existing cigarette smoke.

BBB Complaint ↗

HHM v. Bryant (Georgia, 24-M-07389) — HHM's First Amended Complaint STRICKEN by Court July 30, 2025

In the Georgia dispossessory case HHM v. Bryant et al (Trellis 24-M-07389), the court ordered HHM's First Amended Complaint stricken on July 30, 2025. A Post-Mediation Status Conference and Case Management Conference was set for January 7, 2026.

Trellis.Law / Georgia Courts (July 30, 2025) ↗

Mehl v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust — Active Antitrust Federal Case (S.D. New York 2025)

According to the CourtListener public docket (7:25-cv-06226), Batsheva and Norbert Mehl filed a pro se federal complaint July 28, 2025 in the Southern District of New York naming LSF9 Master Participation Trust alongside Fay Servicing LLC, Auction.com Inc., a real estate LLC, and other defendants. Nature of suit: 410 Anti-Trust. Cause: Federal Question — Real Property. The complaint document (filed with four exhibit attachments) was summons-issued to all defendants. The case remains Active as of the last docket update October 8, 2025.

CourtListener / PACER ↗

Lone Star Acquires 10,000+ UK Student Housing Beds While US Tenants Wait Months for Repairs (2025)

In June 2025, Lone Star acquired nine purpose-built student accommodation assets in the UK from Unite Students for £212 million — bringing its UK student housing portfolio to over 10,000 beds. Global Head of Commercial Real Estate Jérôme Foulon stated the acquisition aligns with Lone Stars global strategy and allows them to unlock long-term value. Meanwhile in the US, HHM tenants were reporting 76 days without AC, toxic mold at 3 million count, no water for 15 days, and 60-day waits for basic maintenance.

Business Wire / Lone Star Funds ↗

Lincoln Yards: Lone Star Defaulted on $126M Loan — $6B Chicago Megadevelopment Collapsed

Lone Star Funds backed out of funding the $6 billion Lincoln Yards megadevelopment in Chicago, defaulting on a $126 million loan. Bank OZK seized the 31-acre northern portion of the site and sold it for $84 million — a massive loss. The Chicago Teachers Pension Fund had previously rejected a $300 million investment proposal partly due to Lone Stars predatory lending history. Chicago housing counselors had concluded that Lone Stars pattern of complaints suggests these are not isolated incidents but rather a clear part of Lone Stars business model.

The Real Deal / Chicago Reporter ↗

Massachusetts Eviction Record Sealing Law — Dismissed Cases Sealed Immediately (G.L. c. 239, §16, May 5, 2025)

On May 5, 2025, Massachusetts enacted G.L. c. 239, §16 (part of the Affordable Homes Act signed by Governor Healey in 2024), allowing tenants to seal eviction records. For dismissed cases or cases where judgment entered for the tenant, the record may be sealed IMMEDIATELY after conclusion of the case including exhaustion of appeal rights, with no waiting period and no notice required. The law makes it illegal for consumer reporting agencies to include sealed records in their reports. Once sealed, a dismissed eviction cannot appear in tenant screening background checks used by landlords, property managers, or housing authorities.

Massachusetts Legal Services / MLRI / Mass.gov ↗

Lone Star Sold Tokyo Beta (16,000 Rental Rooms, Japan) After Adding Smartphone App & Electric Scooters — Contrast with HHM No Heat/Mold

Lone Star sold Tokyo Beta — one of Tokyo's largest rental portfolios (16,000 rooms, 1,200+ shared houses). Lone Star bought non-performing loans in Japan 2020-2022, restructured 200 individual property managers onto one platform, rebranded to Tokyo Beta, then added: smartphone rental app, simplified digital check-in/check-out, energy-saving utilities and fixtures, and commuter-friendly electric scooters. Then sold the entire portfolio for profit.

BusinessWire / Lone Star Funds Press Release ↗

Senator Warren Questions HUD Secretary Nominee on Private Equity Housing — January 2025

At the Senate Banking Committee confirmation hearing in January 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren questioned HUD Secretary nominee Scott Turner directly about cracking down on private equity in the housing market. Warren stated: Some people are trying to take advantage of our housing shortage instead of trying to fix it. We have got to be laser focused on lowering the cost of housing for families. Turner responded that he believes there is a housing affordability crisis and would look into the issue with Warren if confirmed.

Senator Warren Press Release ↗

HHM Annual Revenue: Only $15 Million on 3,559 Homes — Employees Say Company May Not Exist in 2026

According to business intelligence data, Hudson Homes Management LLC had annual revenue of approximately $15 million in 2025 — managing 3,559 properties across 40+ markets. Ryan Hill serves as Vice President. ZoomInfo data shows HHM experiencing very low activity levels compared to other companies in the real estate sector. A Glassdoor employee review states: This company may not exist in 2026. Indeed employee reviews document internal talk of layoffs when numbers started going down. HHM has shrunk from 61 markets to 40 markets. The company has shown all the signs of it, according to one employee — suggesting the November 2024 layoffs were only the beginning.

RocketReach / Glassdoor / ZoomInfo ↗

HUD Issued New 2025 VAWA Compliance Forms — HHM Was Filing Without Any Form

In 2025, HUD issued updated VAWA compliance forms and guidance, confirming VAWA disclosure requirements as an active regulatory compliance area for all Section 8 landlords. The Violence Against Women Act requires landlords receiving federal housing assistance to provide specific disclosure forms to all tenants. Failure to provide these forms is a federal violation. The Massachusetts eviction dismissed in May 2026 was filed without any VAWA disclosure form.

Offit Kurman / JD Supra ↗

Glassdoor Employee: HHM Is 'Cart Before the Horse' — 'Senior Management All On Completely Separate Pages'

A Glassdoor review of Hudson Homes Management states: 'This company is cart before the horse in every sense. Senior management are all on completely separate pages at all times. They have improved recently but too little too late. This company may not exist in 2026.' The review was written in the context of the company being hybrid when employees wanted remote work. A separate Indeed review confirms: 'when the numbers started going down; there was talk amongst teams about layoffs and the company showed all the signs of it.' The top searched question about HHM on Glassdoor in 2026 is about layoffs.

Glassdoor / Indeed ↗

BBB Complaints — Toxic Mold and Habitability Failures, Delayed Remediation (2024–2025)

Multiple BBB complaints document HHM's response to mold and habitability crises in occupied homes. In one complaint, a tenant reported toxic mold levels of 3 million spores in the attic — a level where 100 is considered high — with the mold testing company stating the home was too dangerous to occupy. HHM initially refused to pay for a licensed mold removal team; remediation was approved only after the complaint was escalated, commencing in January 2025. In a separate complaint, a tenant with three children reported sewage leaks, flooding, mice, and mold requiring remediation. Water damage was repeatedly and improperly repaired over months before remediation was performed. HHM subsequently raised rent from $1,375 to $1,650 with no negotiation. A third complaint detailed a hurricane-damaged roof that went untarped for nearly a month, resulting in a partial ceiling collapse. Six months after the damage, HHM had only sent vendors for bids with no repairs completed, with HHM and its maintenance contractor NorthSight each blaming the other for inaction.

Better Business Bureau ↗

Federal Litigation Map — HHM Named in 8 Federal Courts Across 7 States (2019–2025)

Federal court records obtained through CourtListener confirm Hudson Homes Management LLC has been a named party in federal cases across at least 7 states and 8 federal district courts between 2019 and 2025. The confirmed federal docket includes: (1) D. Oregon — Weiss v. HHM, 6:19-cv-01104 (2019, Contract); (2) D. Rhode Island — Burwell v. Hudson Home Management, 1:21-cv-00264 (2021, Diversity Tort, Plaintiff jury demand); (3) N.D. Georgia — HHM v. Cooks, 1:22-cv-04142 (2022, FDCPA invoked by tenant, appealed to 11th Circuit); (4) E.D. Michigan — Nelson v. I.Q. Data International, 4:22-cv-12710 (2022, Federal Question); (5) N.D. Georgia — HSFRF 3 v. Cooks, 1:23-cv-01298 (2023, FDCPA + Fair Housing Act invoked); (6) N.D. Georgia — HHM v. Davis, 1:24-cv-02609 (2024, closed 39 days after filing); (7) D. Maryland — Cooper v. I.Q. Data International, 1:24-cv-02120 (2024, FCRA); (8) W.D. New York — Fair v. HHM, 1:25-cv-00932 (2025, ACTIVE).

CourtListener Federal Docket Database ↗

BBB Profile — 135 Complaints in 3 Years, Including Predatory Move-Out Charges (2025)

The BBB profile for Hudson Homes Management LLC reflects 135 total complaints filed in the last three years, with 88 categorized as Service or Repair Issues and 19 as Billing Issues. Documented complaint patterns include: (1) A military family who relocated reported moving into a property with pre-existing cigarette odor; HHM charged $575 at move-out for alleged smoking damage and cleaning fees, including items the tenant documented as pre-existing at move-in. (2) A Section 8 tenant was forced to vacate because HHM was selling the property, moved out in February 2025, but was billed through May 2025 — including daily late fees for a unit the tenant had already vacated — with the balance sent to collections. (3) In one case, HHM waived $8,456.89 in collections debt and refunded a $1,795 security deposit only after a BBB complaint was filed, with the tenant reporting HHM's collection agency had grown the credit bureau balance to $10,034 through added interest. (4) A Florida tenant whose landlord allowed the property to enter foreclosure was charged approximately $200/day for days not occupied, $300 for removal of a single box, and $250 for lawn mowing — items not listed on the move-out checklist.

Better Business Bureau ↗

BPIA: HHM Filed Ohio Eviction Claiming Both Owner AND Agent — Then Filed No Brief and Produced No Evidence of Standing

Bill Paatalo at BP Investigative Agency documented an Ohio eviction case brought by Hudson Homes Management LLC claiming to be both the owner of the property and the agent for the lessor LSF9 Master Participation Trust — contradictory positions. After Paatalo assisted defense counsel in filing a motion to dismiss for standing, the magistrate granted the plaintiff leave to file a responsive brief proving authority and standing. Paatalo predicted HHM would fail to respond. As predicted, HHM filed no responsive brief and produced no evidence of standing at the hearing beyond pointing at the county auditor website.

BP Investigative Agency — Bill Paatalo ↗

Ohio Court Dismissal — HHM Fails to Prove Ownership or Agency (2024)

In an Ohio eviction case, Hudson Homes Management LLC filed as both the property owner and agent for LSF9 Master Participation Trust (U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee). Forensic investigator Bill Paatalo (Oregon PSID #49411) assisted defense counsel in filing a Motion to Dismiss challenging HHM's standing and authority. The magistrate granted HHM leave to file a responsive brief proving its agency relationship and standing. HHM failed to file any responsive brief and produced no evidence at the hearing beyond pointing to the county auditor's website. The magistrate dismissed the case. Paatalo concluded: "Further confirmation that U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as Trustee, the LSF9 Master Participation Trust, Hudson Homes Management, LLC, or any combination thereof, do not own the properties they foreclosed upon."

BP Investigative Agency ↗

Congressman Demands FTC Investigate Private Equity Housing Price Gouging — 500,000 Homes, 40% of Market by 2030

Congressman Pat Ryan wrote to FTC Chair Lina Khan demanding investigation into price gouging by Wall Street private equity firms. Ryan stated that private equity firms own more than 500,000 homes and are expected to control 40% of the U.S. single-family rental market by 2030. Single-family home prices have risen 47.1% since 2020 and rental costs have increased 30%. Ryan stated: Wall Street speculators are buying up houses and jacking up prices on hard-working families. It is textbook price gouging. Lone Star Funds through HHM is exactly the type of firm Ryan's letter targets.

Congressman Pat Ryan Press Release ↗

Lone Star Raises $5.3 Billion Distressed CRE Fund Under New CEO Quintin — July 2024

Under newly appointed CEO Donald Quintin, Lone Star closed a $5.3 billion fund targeting distressed commercial real estate. This is Lone Star's continued deployment of the same distressed asset acquisition model that produced LSF9 and HHM — buy distressed at discount, extract value, sell.

The Real Deal Texas (July 8, 2024) ↗

HHM v. Davis — Federal Eviction Filed and Closed in 39 Days, N.D. Georgia (2024)

Hudson Homes Management v. Davis (N.D. Ga. 1:24-cv-02609) was filed on June 14, 2024 and terminated on July 23, 2024 — 39 days after filing. The rapid closure is consistent with either a voluntary dismissal (typically after the tenant vacates or pays), a settlement, or a remand to state court — the same procedural outcome seen in the two Cooks cases. The pattern of filing evictions in federal court as the initiating plaintiff is unusual; most landlords file in state magistrate courts. Federal filing by HHM may reflect strategic use of federal jurisdiction to pressure tenants who are less likely to have federal court experience or representation.

PacerMonitor — N.D. Ga. 1:24-cv-02609 ↗

Donald Quintin Named Lone Star's First-Ever CEO — April 2024 — Grayken Steps Back to Chairman

Lone Star Funds appointed Donald J. Quintin as its first CEO and Global President in April 2024 — ending nearly three decades of John Grayken running the firm alone (what investors called 'the John Show'). Grayken remains Chairman. Quintin joined Lone Star in 2010 after negotiating a deal for Lone Star to buy $31 billion of Merrill Lynch mortgage-backed securities for 22 cents on the dollar. Lone Star simultaneously raised a $5.3 billion fund for distressed commercial real estate under Quintin's leadership.

The Real Deal / Bisnow (April 2024) ↗

LSF8 Master Participation Trust — Confirmed in Massachusetts (24H77SP001304)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, case 24H77SP001304 identifies HHM as managing agent for the LSF8 Master Participation Trust — a Lone Star trust entity distinct from LSF9 and LSF10. Filed the same day as an LSF9 case at the same court.

MassCourts.org ↗

HHM Charges 8+ Mandatory & Conditional Fees on Top of Rent — Including Mandatory RBP and SmartLock

From HHM own published Explanation of Fees page: Required fees for ALL tenants include (1) non-refundable $50 application fee per adult regardless of screening outcome, (2) one-time move-in admin fee, (3) mandatory monthly Resident Benefits Package (RBP) fee covering air filter delivery, identity theft protection, credit building, and tenant rewards, and (4) mandatory monthly SmartLock/SmartHub fee. Conditional non-refundable fees include self-tour fees ($1.99-$11.99), pet screening fees ($20-$30/year), trip charges if maintenance finds nothing wrong, HOA violation chargebacks including court appearance costs, and eviction legal reimbursement fees.

HudsonHomesManagement.com ↗

HHM BBB Response: Admits Continuing Collections Against Tenant Whose Lease HHM Terminated to Sell

HHM BBB response states they are 'continuing to work with the tenant in our ongoing collection efforts' on a nearly 3-year tenant whose lease HHM broke to sell the house. Tenant states HHM is 'knowingly and openly admitting that they are fraudulently charging multiple tenants.'

BBB Complaint Response — Public Record ↗

HHM Confirmed as Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Hudson Advisors L.P. — SEC-Penalized Entity Has Direct Liability

HHM's own website and LinkedIn profile state: Hudson Homes Management LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hudson Advisors L.P. Hudson Advisors L.P. is the investment advisor that paid a $11.2M SEC civil penalty in 2022 for concealing John Grayken's personal tax liability in fees. As the parent company and direct owner of HHM, Hudson Advisors L.P. has direct corporate liability for HHM's conduct — including VAWA violations, FDCPA violations, and consumer protection violations. This is not a distant parent relationship — HHM is wholly owned.

HudsonHomesManagement.com / LinkedIn ↗

Grayken Net Worth: $7.48 Billion (Forbes 424th Richest in World)

John Grayken is worth $7.48 billion as of 2024, ranked 424th on the Forbes World Billionaires list. His fortune is built on distressed debt — buying foreclosed mortgages and troubled loans at deep discounts, then collecting rent or foreclosing on the properties. Hudson Advisors has managed over $260 billion in assets for Lone Star Funds since inception.

Forbes / Grizzly Bulls ↗

Hudson Advisors Has Underwritten $777.3 Billion in Real Estate — HHM Founded 2018 as Vertically Integrated Platform

According to Hudson Advisors' own website: Since 2014, Hudson has underwritten approximately $777.3 billion in real estate opportunities and managed approximately $177.9 billion in assets globally. In 2018, Hudson established Hudson Homes, a vertically integrated platform for US single-family residential portfolios. Hudson Advisors is an approximately 900-person global asset management company owned and controlled by the founder of Lone Star.

Hudson Advisors Website ↗

HHM Violated Its Own Written Contract — Sent Charges to Collections After Signing Agreement to Waive Them

A BBB review documents a 5-year tenant who received an eviction notice at the last minute, then signed a written contract with HHM agreeing that the tenant would receive a $2,500 relocation fee after cleaning the property to move-in status. The contract explicitly stated any and all late or overdue expenses will be wiped clean and forgiven and not added to their credit report or anything. The tenant cleaned the property, had HHM inspect and confirm the condition, and completed all requirements. The first thing HHM did was apply the charges to the tenants credit score and put the account in collections — in direct violation of the signed written contract.

BBB Review ↗

HHM Uses Its Own Defective Eviction Filings to Screen Out Future Tenants

Hudson Homes Management's own Terms of Use state: Applicants must not have any evictions within the last five years. No more than two dispossessory filings annually in the past three years. Forcible Entry and Detainers (Evictions) due to property damage, unpaid rent, drug use or any criminal activity will not be accepted under any circumstances. HHM uses eviction records as a screening criterion — the same records created by its own defective filings.

HudsonHomesManagement.com ↗

BBB Customer Reviews — Hudson Homes Management (2024–2025)

The BBB customer reviews section for Hudson Homes Management documents multiple consumer accounts from 2024 and 2025, including: tenants charged daily holdover fees after vacating when sold the property with less than 60 days notice; a Section 8 tenant charged through May 2025 despite vacating February 1, 2025; and a former long-term tenant (4.5 years) who received no security deposit accounting for over 2 months post-move-out. Multiple accounts reference the inability to reach staff through the portal or by phone.

Better Business Bureau ↗

BPIA: U.S. Bank Trust N.A. Filed Allegedly False Disclosure in Massachusetts Federal Court

Bill Paatalo of BP Investigative Agency documented a case in which U.S. Bank Trust N.A. — the same entity named as trustee in LSF9 evictions including the dismissed Massachusetts case — allegedly filed a false or fraudulent disclosure in a Massachusetts federal court. Paatalo has documented a pattern of U.S. Bank Trust filing inaccurate chain-of-title disclosures in courts across multiple states, concealing the VOLT LLC and LSF9 Mortgage Holdings entities that are the actual parties in interest.

BP Investigative Agency ↗

BBB: Hurricane Damaged Roof — HHM Left 3x4 Foot Ceiling Hole for 6+ Months

According to a ComplaintsBoard complaint: A hurricane damaged the tenants roof. Hudson Homes waited almost a month to send someone to tarp the roof, causing continued water damage including part of the ceiling collapsing — a 3 by 4 foot hole with a significant crack spanning the rest of the ceiling. After 6 months, two vendors had been sent for bids three months earlier, but the tenant heard nothing. Northsight blamed Hudson Homes; Hudson Homes blamed Northsight. The tenant continued paying rent on time throughout.

ComplaintsBoard.com ↗

BBB: HHM Failed to Pay HOA Fees — Tenant Received Foreclosure Notice While Still Paying Rent

A BBB complaint documents a tenant who gave 60-day notice of early termination due to suspected mold. While the notice was pending, the tenant received a notice of eviction and foreclosure — not because of anything they did, but because HHM had failed to pay HOA fees on the property. HHM acknowledged the issue and repeatedly said they were escalating it, but the tenant ultimately received a letter stating the HOA would file foreclosure due to delinquent fees. The tenant was being threatened with foreclosure from a property they were renting while HHM pocketed rent payments.

BBB Complaint / ComplaintsBoard ↗

Federal Legislation — Congress Proposes Protections for Tenants of Institutional SFR Investors

Multiple pieces of federal legislation introduced in 2023–2026 address the specific pattern documented in this archive. The Stop Predatory Investing Act (Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-OH, 2023) would restrict tax breaks for large corporate investors that buy up single-family homes. The End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act (Sen. Jeff Merkley, 2023) would ban hedge funds from the single-family housing market. The Stop Wall Street Landlords Act (Rep. Summer Lee, reintroduced 2026) targets institutional investors holding 15+ single-family homes. A January 2026 executive order directed HUD to require disclosure of ownership details in federal housing assistance programs to identify institutional involvement. The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (2024) documented that large investors 'often sell their single-family properties in bulk, which makes them inaccessible for households to buy,' and noted that cities including Minneapolis and Columbia Heights, MN have passed local ordinances limiting investor-owned SFR concentration.

Congress.gov / Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis / Urban Institute ↗

BBB Documented Pattern — HHM 'Selling the Home' Notices and Post-Vacancy Collection (2024–2025)

Multiple BBB complaints from 2024 and 2025 document a specific sequence: (1) tenant receives a certified letter from HHM stating they are 'selling the home' and the tenant must vacate by a set date; (2) tenant vacates on or before the date; (3) tenant receives a move-out bill ranging from hundreds to 9,261.64; (4) bill sent to collections without itemized breakdown within 30 days; (5) HHM states after 60 days it can no longer assist and refers to collection agency. In one documented case a tenant who vacated March 1, 2024 after receiving a December 2023 sale notice received a 9,000 bill on April 2, 2024 with no itemization. A Section 8 voucher holder who vacated February 1, 2025 was charged through May 2025 — three months of post-vacancy fees. A tenant of 4.5 years who vacated January 31, 2025 after a sale notice had not received an itemized statement or deposit return after two months of attempts to contact HHM.

BBB Complaints — Multiple Pages ↗

HHM Policy: Tenants Charged Trip Fees If Nothing Wrong Found — Discourages Maintenance Requests

Hudson Homes Management's own published Resident Responsibilities policy states: If a maintenance request is placed and nothing is determined to be wrong, you will incur a trip charge. Additionally, tenants are warned to avoid placing false requests or falsely flagging items as emergency. Repairs performed by the landlord on tenants behalf for HOA or municipal violations will be charged back plus violation fines plus cost for court hearing appearances.

HudsonHomesManagement.com ↗

Northsight Management LLC — HHM's Maintenance Contractor — Co-Defendant in Anderson Federal Lawsuit — Both Sponsored IMN SFR Conference May 2026

Northsight Management LLC (Scottsdale AZ, founded 2009) is HHM's designated maintenance contractor, servicing 'the single family rental and default industry across the U.S.' Estimated revenue $19.1M, 136 employees. Phone: 602.842.4000. Northsight 'preserves more than $700 million in real estate assets nationwide' and specializes in 'mortgage field services including marketable & conveyance repairs, REO property maintenance' — explicitly bridging the foreclosure/default side with the rental side. Named alongside HHM as co-defendant in Anderson v. Hudson Homes Management LLC + Northsight Management LLC (federal court). Northsight and HHM both sponsored the IMN Single Family Rental Forum East in Miami in May 2026.

LinkedIn / Northsight.com / UniCourt ↗

BBB Complaints — Military Families and Section 8 Holders Documented in Wind-Down

BBB complaint records document the specific populations affected by HHM's portfolio wind-down. (1) Military family: A complainant identifies as 'a military family who relocated' and describes being placed in a home with pre-existing odor and cleanliness issues, then having those same conditions charged back at move-out. The complaint requests that HHM acknowledge the pre-existing conditions 'were not caused by my tenancy.' (2) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher holder: A tenant who held a Section 8 voucher was told in November 2024 to vacate by January 31, 2025 — the property was being sold. The tenant vacated February 1, 2025. Housing authority continued to pay HHM's portion for February. HHM then charged the tenant holdover fees through May 2025 — three months after they vacated — at a daily rate. The tenant could not submit move-out documentation because portal access had been removed. The account resulted in collections. (3) Long-term tenant (4.5 years): Tenant received an 'intent to sell' notice after four and a half years, vacated as directed, and had not received security deposit or itemized statement after two months of documented email follow-up.

Better Business Bureau — Dallas and Irving Profiles ↗

HHM Charges $300 Non-Refundable Pet Fee PLUS $35/Month Pet Rent PLUS $20-30/Year PetScreening Fee

HHM's published fee structure charges pet owners three separate fees: (1) One-time non-refundable $300 per pet fee due before move-in; (2) $35 per month per pet rent charged in addition to base rent; (3) $20-$30 per year per pet through third-party PetScreening.com profile. A tenant with one pet in a 12-month lease pays $300 + ($35 x 12) + $25 = $745 in pet-related charges beyond base rent. The $300 fee is explicitly described as covering 'normal wear and tear' — meaning HHM collects a dedicated fund for pet wear and tear but can still withhold the security deposit for additional damage.

HudsonHomesManagement.com ↗

Glassdoor — Employee Discloses 3,000+ Lease Terminations to Return Assets to Trust

A Glassdoor review by a former HHM employee states their team oversaw 'the termination of over 3,000 leases to return the RE assets to the trust for sale,' describing this as a successful mission that resulted in their position being eliminated. The review is an anonymous employee submission — it is not a company filing or verified operational document. It is included here as internal context, clearly labeled as such.

Glassdoor (Employee Review — Unverified Internal Account) ↗

HHM Website Tells Residents to Avoid Filing Maintenance Requests — Do It Yourself at Your Own Cost

HHM's published Resident Responsibilities page instructs tenants: 'Avoid placing maintenance requests for items that are deemed resident responsibilities. Please address these issues at a professional level and at your own cost.' The page also warns: 'If a maintenance request is placed and nothing is determined to be wrong, you will incur a trip charge.' These two policies together create a financial deterrent to reporting any maintenance issue — tenants risk being charged for the service call if HHM disagrees with their assessment of what constitutes a landlord responsibility.

HudsonHomesManagement.com ↗

I.Q. Data International — HHM's Post-Move-Out Debt Collection and Credit Reporting Pipeline

Multiple BBB complaints from former HHM tenants identify I.Q. Data International as the debt collector HHM uses to pursue move-out balances and report them to credit bureaus. I.Q. Data International (also operating as RentCollect Global) is a Washington-based debt collection agency specializing exclusively in multi-family residential properties. It has over 350 CFPB complaints and a 1.01/5 BBB rating. Consumer complaints describe accounts appearing on credit reports without prior notice — a practice the CFPB made explicitly prohibited under Regulation F in 2021. At least three federal FCRA lawsuits (Michigan 2022, Georgia 2024, Maryland 2024) involve I.Q. Data in connection with residential property management disputes. One BBB complaint from a former HHM tenant states the company turned over a debt to 'a collection agency — that they own,' raising an undisclosed financial relationship concern. The 0,034 credit bureau reporting amount documented in one 2025 BBB complaint began as a security deposit dispute.

BBB Complaints / CFPB / CourtListener ↗

HHM Leadership: Raymond Templet (COO/Wharton), Donald Quintin (Lone Star CEO/Ex-Merrill Lynch)

Hudson Homes Management leadership documented from public sources. COO Raymond Templet holds a Wharton School economics degree; former Deutsche Bank structured finance banker and SL Green Realty acquisitions; oversaw HHM since its 2018 inception. VP Erin Dixon and Secretary Alana Stelton-Swan listed as officers. HHM VP Ryan Hill (University of North Texas) and Shawn Shorkey (VP REO Operations) also documented. Lone Star CEO Donald Quintin, Global President, joined Lone Star in 2010 after leading distressed structured debt and mortgage sales at Merrill Lynch. HHM headquarters: 4849 Greenville Ave, 5th Floor, Dallas TX 75206. Phone: 877-565-4669. Employee count: 101-200 (down from 250+).

Hudson Advisors / BBB / RocketReach ↗

HHM Application Fees Are Non-Refundable — Tenants Report Paying $50+ With No Response

HHM policy states all application fees are non-refundable. HHM charges $50 per applicant plus processing fees (documented as $7.90 in one complaint). A BBB review documents a tenant and friend each paying $50 application fees, never hearing back after 12 days and numerous inquiries. A RevDex complaint documents a tenant whose application cleared screening but the property had already been assigned to someone else - HHM kept the fees and offered only 4 other properties as alternatives.

BBB / RevDex ↗

BBB Profile — Consumer Complaint Pattern

The BBB profile for Hudson Homes Management LLC reflects a documented complaint pattern across the review period. The BBB report categorizes complaints by issue type including billing, customer service, and delivery of services.

Better Business Bureau ↗

HHM Corporate Disclosure — Company Website

Per the company's own website, Hudson Homes Management LLC is described as "a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hudson Advisors L.P." managing single-family residential properties nationwide across 61 U.S. markets.

HudsonHomesManagement.com ↗

NorthSight Management — Circular Blame Pattern Documented Across Tenant Complaints

Multiple tenant complaints across BBB and ComplaintsBoard document a consistent pattern in which Hudson Homes Management LLC and its maintenance subsidiary NorthSight Management LLC deflect responsibility for habitability failures by blaming each other, leaving tenants without repairs for weeks or months. Documented cases include: (1) A tenant in Oklahoma reported interior temperatures exceeding 100°F for 11 consecutive days during summer heat; maintenance took 6 days to send a technician. When the tenant escalated, 'NorthSight blamed Hudson Homes and Hudson Homes blamed NorthSight' with no resolution. (2) Hurricane roof damage went untarped for nearly a month, causing partial ceiling collapse. Six months later, only vendor bids had been obtained. HHM and NorthSight again attributed delays to each other. (3) A federal court record (Raymond Anderson v. Hudson Homes Management LLC, NorthSight Management LLC) confirms NorthSight is named as a co-defendant in at least one federal property lawsuit, establishing it as a distinct legal entity subject to independent claims.

ComplaintsBoard / BBB / CourtListener ↗

IQ Data International — HHM's Collection Agency Linked to Federal FDCPA/FCRA Lawsuits

Federal court records confirm that IQ Data International Inc. — the third-party debt collection agency that Hudson Homes Management LLC refers disputed tenant balances to — has been named in multiple federal lawsuits by former HHM tenants alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Confirmed cases include: (1) Nelson v. I.Q. Data International Inc., E.D. Michigan, No. 4:22-cv-12710 (filed Nov. 2022) — Federal Question jurisdiction; (2) Cooper v. I.Q. Data International Inc., D. Maryland, No. 1:24-cv-02120 (filed July 2024) — FCRA, 15 U.S.C. §1681; (3) Sturgill v. Equifax Information Services LLC, N.D. Georgia, No. 1:24-cv-01699 (filed April 2024) — FCRA, involving an HHM-originated debt appearing on a credit report. The pattern documented across BBB complaints and these federal cases is consistent: HHM refers disputed move-out balances to IQ Data, IQ Data reports the debt to credit bureaus, and tenants who contest the underlying charges are forced into federal litigation to clear their credit records. In at least one BBB complaint, HHM waived $8,456.89 in IQ Data collections and refunded a $1,795 deposit only after a public complaint — suggesting the underlying debt may not have been valid.

CourtListener / PACER Federal Dockets ↗

Portfolio Wind-Down — 3,000+ Lease Terminations and the 2023–2025 Displacement Wave

A Glassdoor employee review discloses that an HHM team oversaw 'the termination of over 3,000 leases to return the RE assets to the trust for sale,' with the reviewer's own position eliminated upon mission completion. This internal account is corroborated by a surge in BBB complaints from late 2023 through 2025 describing the same operational sequence: non-renewal notices citing property sales, limited move-out windows, holdover charges assessed post-vacancy, security deposits withheld without itemization, and debt sent to collections without response. One BBB complainant reports a property was in foreclosure while they were paying rent. Another reports daily holdover charges assessed through May 2025 after vacating February 1, 2025 — a Section 8 household told to leave because the property was being sold.

Glassdoor / BBB Complaints 2023–2025 ↗

BPIA Expert Disclosure (Massachusetts): LSF9 Master Participation Trust Is a Pseudonym — Does Not Own Any Mortgage

Licensed private investigator Bill Paatalo filed an expert disclosure in a Massachusetts case documenting that U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for the LSF9 Master Participation Trust does not purchase, sell, own, hold, or control any mortgage note. Paatalo documents that VOLT LLC entities and LSF9 Mortgage Holdings LLC are the actual parties concealed behind the LSF9 name. Fay Servicings own witness admitted under oath he does not know if there was ever an assignment from LSF9 Mortgage Holdings to LSF9 MPT. An Essex County NJ Limited Power of Attorney executed by Caliber Home Loans shows VOLT LLC entities as the actual sellers holding the mortgage loans, with LSF9 Mortgage Holdings as the purchaser — not LSF9 Master Participation Trust. An SEC Form ABS-15G filed 2/1/2021 confirms LSF9 Mortgage Holdings LLC as the actual securitizer for the VOLT series trusts.

BP Investigative Agency — Bill Paatalo ↗

BBB Complaints — Payment System Disruption and Eviction Pattern (2023)

BBB complaint records from 2023 document a pattern in which tenants were informed their online payment methods had been rejected and directed to use a cash-based alternative service (Pay Near Me). Multiple accounts describe receiving no response to attempts to resolve the payment system issue, followed by eviction proceedings initiated before the dispute was resolved. One account describes a tenant who had never missed a payment in nearly three years being told their lease was already in eviction status.

Better Business Bureau ↗

HSFRF 2 — Second Lone Star Single-Family Residential Fund Confirmed as Federal Litigant

CourtListener docket 70488007 confirms HSFRF 2 as a separately named federal plaintiff in the Northern District of Georgia (1:23-cv-03934), filed September 2023, terminated 28 days later. Combined with HSFRF 3 v. Cooks (1:23-cv-01298) and HHM v. Cooks (1:22-cv-04142), the archive now documents three Lone Star-affiliated entities filing federal actions in the same district in a 12-month span, all terminating within 30 days. HSFRF stands for Hudson Single Family Residential Fund. The existence of at least HSFRF 2 and HSFRF 3 as separately filed entities suggests a layered corporate structure operating parallel to HHM for the same underlying assets.

CourtListener / PACER ↗

ComplaintsBoard — Hudson Homes Management Reviews

ComplaintsBoard records reflect consumer reviews of Hudson Homes Management published from July 2023 onward. Documented themes include: delayed hurricane damage repairs (roof collapse, mold concerns), HVAC failures left unresolved for weeks, maintenance vendor disputes between HHM and its affiliated maintenance partner Northsight Management, unexplained late fees, and eviction proceedings during active communication disputes. The platform notes a 4-star average from 9 reviews with 7 complaints marked resolved.

ComplaintsBoard ↗

Raymond Anderson v. Hudson Homes Management + Northsight Management — Federal Property Lawsuit (2023)

Raymond Anderson filed a federal property lawsuit (Case 1:23-CV-01298) against both Hudson Homes Management LLC and Northsight Management LLC on March 27, 2023. This is significant as it names both HHM and its maintenance contractor Northsight as co-defendants in a federal court action, establishing that both entities have been sued together. Federal jurisdiction indicates claims beyond simple landlord-tenant disputes.

UniCourt / U.S. District Courts ↗

HSFRF 3 & HHM — FDCPA Invoked in Two Georgia Federal Evictions, Tenant Alleges Fair Housing Violations (2022–2023)

In two separate Georgia federal cases (N.D. Ga. 1:22-cv-04142 and 1:23-cv-01298), tenant Jamaila Cooks removed HHM eviction actions from Henry County Magistrate Court to federal court, invoking the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. §1692) and the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. §3631). The court filings — obtained through the RECAP/Internet Archive public document system — reveal that the eviction plaintiff was listed jointly as 'HSFRF 3' and 'Hudson Homes Management,' with attorney Matthew Totten representing both. The Dispossessory Affidavit in the 2023 case claimed $20,405.00 in past-due rent covering September 2022 through March 2023. In her federal removal filings, Cooks alleged HHM violated the FDCPA by using prohibited debt collection practices in connection with the eviction, and invoked 42 U.S.C. §3631, which makes it unlawful to use force or intimidation to interfere with housing rights on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. Both cases were remanded back to Henry County Magistrate Court. The 2022 case was appealed to the 11th Circuit (USCA No. 22-13821), which dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

RECAP Archive — N.D. Ga. 1:23-cv-01298 (Public Court Document) ↗

Connecticut Federal Court — HHM Claims Agency for LSF10 Master Participation Trust (2023)

On March 17, 2023, Hudson Homes Management LLC filed a housing action in Connecticut (Case No. KNO-CV23-6108816-S), identifying itself as 'Agent and Legal Representative for U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF10 Master Participation Trust.' The case was filed by law firm Neubert Pepe & Monteith PC against Michael Kingsbury et al. This filing mirrors the structure used in the Ohio eviction case where HHM's claimed agency relationship was challenged and HHM failed to defend it — resulting in dismissal. The Connecticut case extends this pattern to a second trust entity (LSF10, distinct from LSF9) and a second state, confirming that HHM uses this agency/trust structure across multiple jurisdictions.

Trellis.Law — Connecticut Court Docket KNO-CV23-6108816-S ↗

BBB Formal Complaints — Security Deposit and Collections Pattern (2023–2025)

BBB complaint records document a specific move-out sequence across multiple complainants: large final charges issued without itemized breakdown (documented range: several hundred to $19,261); itemized statement requests go unanswered within the 30–60 day window HHM cites; debt transferred to collections without further communication; once with collections, HHM states it can no longer assist. Charges include damages attributed to break-ins occurring after vacating, pre-existing conditions, and in one case a $3,800 full security deposit withheld plus additional charges.

Better Business Bureau ↗

ComplaintsBoard: Tenant Ignored for 5 Months, Evicted for Arbitrary Fees, Now Homeless With Eviction Record

A ComplaintsBoard complaint documents a tenant who missed one payment. HHM applied subsequent payments to a future date rather than the missed payment, adding late charges for a charge not yet in their system. The tenant continued paying rent and attempted to contact HHM for 5 months. HHM ignored all communications. After 5 months of silence, HHM served the tenant with eviction papers demanding full payment including the arbitrary late fees. HHM continued to ignore the tenant and successfully evicted them. The tenant now has no home and an eviction on their record. The tenant stated: I have never had a problem with a landlord prior to this. I am in disbelief that this company is getting away with arbitrarily adding enormous late fees.

ComplaintsBoard.com ↗

HHM Debt Collections Run Through Hudson Advisors — Collection Email is @hudsonadvisor.com

A BBB complaint from a New Jersey tenant documents that when they attempted to resolve a debt with HHM, they contacted collections@hudsonadvisor.com — Hudson Advisors' email domain. The tenant had repeatedly tried reaching njresidents@hudsonhomesmanagement and the Hudson Advisors collections address. Hudson Homes sold the debt without responding to any contact attempts. This email domain confirms that HHM's collection operations are run through or connected to Hudson Advisors L.P. — the SEC-penalized entity — not through an independent third-party collection agency.

BBB Complaint — New Jersey Tenant ↗

Hofer Hagan LLP Legal Analysis — LSF9 Structure

A published law firm analysis examines the LSF9 Master Participation Trust structure and its implications in court proceedings. The analysis reviews how the trust entity appears in filings across multiple jurisdictions.

Hofer Hagan LLP ↗

HHM and HSFRF Classified as Debt Collectors — FDCPA (15:1692) in Federal Evictions

According to CourtListener dockets for 1:22-cv-04142 and 1:23-cv-01298, both HHM v. Cooks and HSFRF 3 v. Cooks cite 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as the cause of action — classifying HHM and HSFRF as debt collectors under federal law. Both cases were filed against the same family, before the same judge (Charles A. Pannell Jr.), and terminated within 30 days each.

CourtListener / PACER ↗

HSFRF Fund Entities — Lone Star's Single-Family Residential Fund Structure

Court records from Georgia federal courts reflect filings by HSFRF 2 and HSFRF 3 (Hudson Single-Family Residential Fund entities) in property disputes. HSFRF entities appear in the beneficial ownership chain alongside or instead of LSF Master Participation Trusts in certain transactions, representing a parallel Lone Star fund structure for single-family rental properties. These entities are connected to Hudson Homes Management in the same court actions.

CourtListener / Trellis.Law ↗

John Grayken — Personal Wealth, Tax Citizenship, and the SEC's $54.6M Finding

Per Wikipedia (sourced from Forbes) and the 2022 SEC administrative order: John Grayken, founder and chairman of Lone Star Funds, has an estimated net worth of $6.9 billion (Forbes 2024). In 1999, Grayken renounced his U.S. citizenship and became an Irish citizen — the Wikipedia article quotes this was done 'for tax purposes.' As of 2017, per Wikipedia, Grayken and his wife resided in a $70 million home in Chelsea, London, purchased through a company in Bermuda. The SEC's 2022 enforcement action (Release No. 2022-159) found that Hudson Advisors L.P. — the entity Grayken owns that directly owns HHM — had allocated $54.6 million of Grayken's personal income tax liability to fund investors across 14 funds over 13 years, without disclosure. The respondents agreed to pay $11.2M in civil penalties and reimbursed affected funds over $68M.

SEC Release No. 2022-159 / Wikipedia (John Grayken) / Forbes ↗

SEC Administrative Order — Hudson Advisors Fee Disclosure

The SEC order states the respondents agreed to pay $11.2 million in civil penalties. According to the order, fund fees were used to cover the founder's personal income tax liability totaling $54.6 million over 13 years across 14 investment vehicles.

SEC.gov ↗

WRI Property Management + HHM + LSF9 — Joint Co-Plaintiff Filing (22H83SP01729PL)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust, WRI Property Management, and Hudson Homes Management LLC filed jointly as co-plaintiffs in a single eviction action, all represented by Jahangir Zaheer, Esq. (Zaheer Law Group, 40 Salem St, Lynnfield MA, Bar 683868). Default judgment of 0,806.76 entered against five defendants at 22 Twelfth Street, Onset MA.

MassCourts.org ↗

TRO Granted Against HHM — Southeast Housing Court (22H83CV00088PL)

According to the public docket at masscourts.org, Judge Donna Salvidio granted a Temporary Restraining Order against Hudson Homes Management on April 5, 2022 after two indigent tenants (Affidavits of Indigency approved) filed a civil action. US Bank Trust, NA appeared Pro Se. HHM retained Charles S. Mancuso, Esq. as defense counsel.

MassCourts.org ↗

Grayken Accused by Delhi Police: Criminal Breach of Trust, Cheating & Criminal Conspiracy (2022)

In 2022, John Grayken was accused by police in Delhi, India of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy. The allegation: Grayken personally became the beneficial owner of RattanIndia Finance when he had told other shareholders that Lone Star Funds would be the acquiring entity. This is the second criminal case involving Grayken after the South Korean stock manipulation conviction.

Wikipedia / India Legal ↗

BPIA: LSF9 Is 'Just a Pseudonym That Holds Nothing' (2022)

Investigator Bill Paatalo's 2022 analysis presents testimony from a servicer witness in Oregon federal litigation confirming that LSF9 Mortgage Holdings — not LSF9 Master Participation Trust — is the entity that actually purchases loans. The transfer to LSF9 MPT occurs within the same day as a paper transaction. Paatalo further documents that 'VOLT LLC' entities and LSF9 Mortgage Holdings operate in the chain of title without disclosure, using LSF7–LSF11 trust names as facades. SEC FORM ABS-15G filings from LSF9 Mortgage Holdings are cited as confirmation.

BPIA — Bill Paatalo Investigative Agency ↗

TikTok — Undisclosed Septic System Found with Alarm and Pump Unplugged

A TikTok video using the #hudsonhomesmanagement hashtag describes discovering that an HHM-managed property contained a septic system not disclosed in the lease, with both the septic alarm and pump found unplugged. Follow-up videos describe continued sewage backup with water leaking through walls. This is an unverified consumer-submitted social media account.

TikTok (#hudsonhomesmanagement) ↗

HHM Uses Its Own Collection Agency to Report Disputed Debts — Ignores Court Judgments Against the Charges

A BBB complaint documents a tenant who properly broke their lease in December 2021. HHM acknowledged the notice but continued charging rent, utilities, and late fees for four extra months. The tenant paid two months per the lease agreement. A judge dismissed the case. Despite the court judgment, HHM continued charging interest on amounts the court ruled were not owed and turned the account over to a collection agency that the tenant explicitly stated HHM owns. The credit bureaus refused to remove the entry despite the tenant presenting the court judgment. A separate BBB complaint documents HHM waiving $8,456.89 in collection debt when legally challenged, confirming the collection operation.

BBB Complaints ↗

Northsight Management — HHM Affiliated Maintenance Vendor

Multiple consumer complaint records, court filings, and review platforms identify Northsight Management LLC as Hudson Homes Management's affiliated property maintenance vendor. Consumer accounts document a recurring pattern in which HHM and Northsight point to each other when maintenance requests are unresolved. Court records from 2022 reflect a civil case naming both entities as co-defendants (Anderson v. HHM / Northsight, N.D. Georgia, 1:22-CV-06731).

CourtListener / ComplaintsBoard / Consumer Accounts ↗

Purnell v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust & Caliber Home Loans — Delaware Supreme Court

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed judgment on the pleadings for LSF9 and Caliber in a mortgage dispute. The court identifies the entity as U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust — the same entity structure appearing across HHM's Massachusetts and federal eviction filings. Citation: No. 67, 2021 (Del. Nov. 16, 2021).

CourtListener / Delaware Supreme Court ↗

Burwell v. Hudson Home Management — Rhode Island Federal Tort Case (2021)

Burwell v. Hudson Home Management, LLC (D.R.I. 1:21-cv-00264) was filed on June 16, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island. The cause of action is classified as 'Diversity — Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle' with a Plaintiff jury demand, and the case lists Raychelle Burwell and Kimberly Teeves as plaintiffs against Hudson Home Management LLC. The case was terminated on July 19, 2021 — 33 days after filing. The Diversity Tort classification indicates the plaintiffs alleged physical harm or property damage and sought damages exceeding $75,000 (the federal diversity threshold), filed in federal court because the parties are from different states.

CourtListener — D.R.I. 1:21-cv-00264 ↗

Foreclosurepedia: Massive Fraud Revealed Impacting Hudson Homes

Industry publication Foreclosurepedia published an investigative article titled Massive Fraud Revealed Impacting Hudson Homes describing HHM as a minor cog in John Graykens Lone Star wheel, attempting to manage a massive nationwide portfolio with both hands tied behind its back. Article is paywalled but confirms industry awareness of systemic issues at HHM dating to at least 2021.

Foreclosurepedia ↗

Bankruptcy Pattern — HHM/LSF9 as Creditors in Chapter 13 Filings Across Multiple States

CourtListener public dockets confirm Hudson Homes Management LLC and LSF9 Master Participation Trust appearing as creditors in at least five Chapter 13 bankruptcy filings across multiple states: James Farrell (D. New Jersey, 2021), Barbara Simone (D. Connecticut Ch.7, 2021), Benjamin and GeriAnn Fracasso (D. New Jersey, 2022), Tamara Johnson (D. New Jersey, 2024), and Eddie Bland (N.D. Georgia, 2025). Chapter 13 bankruptcy is a reorganization plan filed by individuals to save their homes or resolve debts. When HHM or LSF9 appears as a creditor, it typically means the tenant was attempting to halt or resolve an eviction through bankruptcy protection.

CourtListener / PACER ↗

BiggerPockets Forum: LSF9 Properties Go Caliber → Hudson Homes → ResiCap — Community Documents Pattern

A BiggerPockets real estate investor forum thread about LSF9 Master Participation Trust documented the property management succession chain for LSF9 properties: starting with Caliber Homes (OK/TX), transitioning to Hudson Homes (TX), and then to ResiCap (GA). One participant noted: I went from Caliber Homes to Hudson Homes and finally to RESICAP. Hudson Homes told me they wouldn't be selling it anytime soon. The thread shows community-level awareness of the LSF9 trust structure and the rotating cast of management companies.

BiggerPockets Forums ↗

SEC FORM ABS-15G — LSF9 Mortgage Holdings LLC as Securitizer

LSF9 Mortgage Holdings LLC filed Form ABS-15G with the SEC on February 1, 2021, disclosing itself as the 'Securitizer' for VOLT 2019-NPL5 and related asset-backed notes series. Exchange Act Rule 15Ga-1 requires securitizers to disclose repurchase request information. The filing names multiple VOLT LLC entities and their series trusts, confirming LSF9 Mortgage Holdings as the operative securitizer behind VOLT-branded securitization vehicles connected to the LSF trust portfolio.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR) ↗

LSF9 Filed Foreclosure Via 'Lost Assignment' From LETOM Management — Ghost Company, No Officers Found

In LSF9 v. Plummer (Maine 2:20-cv-00171-DBH), Caliber filed a Lost Assignment Affidavit admitting no agents or officers of LETOM MANAGEMENT LLC could be found. Chain of title ended at LETOM — a ghost company. LSF9 claimed ownership anyway.

BP Investigative Agency ↗

NY AG Letitia James: $17M Settlement Against Caliber Home Loans (Lone Star Subsidiary) for Predatory Lending

New York Attorney General Letitia James investigation found that Caliber Home Loans — owned by affiliates of Lone Star Funds — engaged in unfair lending practices. Caliber placed thousands of customers into interest-only loan modifications that reverted to higher payments after 5 years or less. The $17 million settlement provided loan forgiveness to affected borrowers. James stated: mortgage servicers and investors should know that we will always prioritize home ownership for New Yorkers over profits for predatory lenders.

The Real Deal / NY AG Press Release ↗

Ireland: Lone Star Bought 10,700 Home Mortgages from PTSB — 40,000 Facing Eviction Tsunami

Lone Star Funds purchased 10,700 home mortgages from Permanent TSB (Project Glas) in Ireland. The Irish Mortgage Holders Organisation warned of a tsunami of evictions affecting 40,000 people, calling it a horrible day for mortgage holders. Lone Star was described as not offering term extension, split mortgage, rate reduction, or capitalisation of arrears. Sinn Fein said Irish families had been thrown to the mercy of an American vulture fund. The UN Special Rapporteur on Housing criticized Ireland for preferential tax laws and weak tenant protections benefiting vulture funds.

Irish Examiner / IrishCentral ↗

LSF8 Master Participation Trust c/o HHM — Queens County New York, 2020 (Pending)

According to UniCourt, U.S. Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust, c/o Hudson Homes Management LLC filed a property case in Queens County Civil Court February 7, 2020. The case has been repeatedly adjourned and remains Pending — a 5-year-old property dispute. This documents HHM's role as managing agent for LSF8 as early as 2020, four years before the 2024 Massachusetts LSF8 confirmation. It also adds New York to the map of states where HHM has filed on behalf of LSF8.

UniCourt ↗

Property Transfer Records — HHM / LSF10 Selling Properties in Pennsylvania

Property transfer records published by Pennsylvania county newspapers document transactions in which Hudson Homes Management LLC (as attorney-in-fact for U.S. Bank Trust, NA as Trustee for LSF10 Master Participation Trust) transferred residential properties to new buyers in Northumberland County and surrounding counties. These records confirm HHM's operational role as attorney-in-fact for LSF trust vehicles in property conveyances — not just in eviction filings.

The Daily Item (Northumberland County PA) ↗

Chicago Reporter (2019) — Lone Star / Caliber Accused of Predatory Lending Pattern

The Chicago Reporter published an investigation in April 2019 reporting that Lone Star Funds and its affiliated loan servicer Caliber Home Loans had been accused in a report of 'intentionally pursuing foreclosure of homeowners, failing to offer sustainable loan modifications, and aggressively driving up evictions.' Housing counselors at the Northwest Side Housing Center described difficulty getting Caliber representatives to work with them on loan modifications, saying representatives denied receiving documentation 'when we knew darn well they did.' The report noted the volume of complaints 'suggests that these are not isolated incidents but rather a clear part of Lone Star's business model.' The article also noted that Lone Star's founder, John Grayken, 'lives in a $70 million mansion in London' while the firm foreclosed on working-class family homes.

The Chicago Reporter ↗

Lender Liability Lawyer: Lone Star Funds — Distressed Investors or Vultures?

Legal analysis article characterizing Lone Star Funds and Hudson Advisors as potentially the most predatory servicers in the CMBS (commercial mortgage-backed securities) space. Details pattern of purchasing distressed debt at deep discounts and aggressive collection and foreclosure practices.

LenderLiabilityLawyer.com ↗

Lone Star Funds — Business Model: Acquire at Discount, Evaluate Exit Strategy

Per Lone Star Funds' own public materials and descriptions cited in investigative reporting: Lone Star describes itself as seeking 'investment opportunities in markets that have suffered an economic and/or banking crisis' and targeting 'liquidity-constrained but otherwise viable assets.' A financial adviser quoted in Irish parliamentary records noted that Lone Star's own website states it is 'continually evaluating their exit strategy.' HHM was established in 2018, per Hudson Advisors' website, as a 'vertically integrated platform' to manage the single-family rental properties within Lone Star's distressed loan portfolios — specifically the LSF9 and LSF10 Master Participation Trust assets. Hudson Advisors' website references $275 billion in assets managed globally, with HHM's U.S. single-family rental portfolio as one component.

Lone Star Funds / Hudson Advisors (Corporate Websites) / Irish Parliamentary Records ↗

BPIA: 'LSF9 Is a Straw Man' (2018)

Private investigator Bill Paatalo (Oregon PSID #49411) published documentation that LSF9 Master Participation Trust functions as a paper entity without substantive independent holdings, describing it as a 'straw man' in certain transaction structures.

BPIA — Bill Paatalo Investigative Agency ↗

Ireland — Lone Star Criticized as 'Vulture Fund' in Parliamentary Hearings Over Mortgage Holder Treatment

Per Irish Examiner reporting and published Irish parliamentary records (Oireachtas Joint Committee on Finance, March 2023): Lone Star Funds acquired tens of thousands of Irish home mortgages after the 2008 financial crisis, often at deep discounts. The Irish Mortgage Holders Organisation described Lone Star as offering 'no restructuring' — no term extensions, split mortgages, rate reductions, or capitalisation of arrears. A financial adviser told an Oireachtas committee: 'Looking at Lone Star, it is making a substantial return for its shareholders and that is all that matters.' Irish opposition politicians described mortgage holders as being 'thrown to the mercy of an American vulture fund.' Separately, an Irish Workers' Party councillor publicly questioned whether Grayken should have received Irish citizenship given that Lone Star had been 'instrumental to worsening the debt and evictions crisis in Ireland.'

Irish Examiner / Oireachtas Joint Committee Records ↗

CFPB Complaint Database — Caliber / Newrez

Public records show over 1,200 complaints filed against Caliber Home Loans (now Newrez LLC), the affiliated loan servicer, in the CFPB consumer complaint database. Common issues include loan servicing, payment processing, and communication concerns.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ↗

NBC New York I-Team Investigation — LSF9 Disproportionate Impact on Communities of Color (2017)

An NBC New York I-Team investigation found that a lawsuit alleged LSF9 Master Participation Trust's acquisition and management of FHA-insured distressed mortgages had a disproportionate impact on neighborhoods of color. The plaintiff's attorney stated: 'These homeowners are predominantly African American in New York City.' NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer called the practices 'predatory lending' and wrote directly to Lone Star Chairman John Grayken. The investigation also found that New York City public pension funds had approximately 90 million invested in Lone Star funds — including the fund of a retired NYPD officer whose father faced foreclosure by the same Lone Star entity her pension was invested in.

NBC New York I-Team ↗

NY State Teachers Retirement System Has $48M in LSF9 — NYC Public Pensions Have $990M in Lone Star Funds

According to NBC New York I-Team investigation (2017): The New York State Teachers Retirement System had $48 million invested specifically in LSF9 Master Participation Trust. The New York City five public pension funds had a total of approximately $990 million invested in Lone Star funds broadly. The Fasano class action lawsuit noted LSF9's acquisitions had 'a disproportionate impact on neighborhoods of color' in New York City — predominantly African American homeowners.

NBC New York I-Team (August 10, 2017) ↗

NBC New York I-Team: NY Pension Funds Invested $1B+ in Lone Star While It Foreclosed on City Workers

NBC New York I-Team investigation found NY state and NYC public pension funds invested over $1 billion in Lone Star Funds while Lone Star was foreclosing on the homes of the very city workers whose pensions funded the investments. NYPD retiree Karen Morrison discovered her police pension fund invested $100M+ in Lone Star — the company threatening to foreclose on her fathers house. NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer wrote directly to John Grayken expressing concern. Then-Public Advocate Letitia James (now NY AG) successfully opposed further Lone Star investments and called the practice using workers money against them.

NBC New York ↗

Four Black Homeowners Filed Federal Lawsuit Against Lone Star — LSF9 Disproportionately Impacted Communities of Color

Four African-American homeowners in New York filed a federal lawsuit against Lone Star Funds and HUD, alleging Lone Star pushed them toward foreclosure by misleading them about their mortgages. One plaintiff described Caliber calling multiple times daily, threatening foreclosure and pressuring him to accept unfavorable loan modifications. Distressed mortgages are disproportionately located in working-class communities of color which have been systematically targeted for more expensive loan products. LSF9 specifically was named as having a disproportionate impact on neighborhoods of color.

MPA Magazine / NBC New York ↗

Grayken Lives in $70M Chelsea London Mansion — Purchased Through Bermuda Shell Company

John Grayken and wife Eilene Davidson live in a $70 million home in Chelsea, London, purchased through a company registered in Bermuda — an offshore tax haven. They also own Pyrford Court in Surrey, a Grade II listed 15-bedroom estate built in 1910 for the 2nd Earl of Iveagh, famously featured in the 1976 horror film The Omen. Meanwhile, HHM tenants in Massachusetts reported houses cold enough to see their breath indoors.

Wikipedia / Forbes ↗

openDemocracy: Lone Star Named Among Wall Street Giants Buying €223B in Troubled European Real Estate

openDemocracy investigation named Lone Star Funds alongside Goldman Sachs, Cerberus, and Blackstone as having bought more than 223 billion euros worth of troubled real estate loans in Europe since the 2008 crash. In Ireland, vulture funds owned 48,199 mortgage accounts. The article documented how these firms profit from ordinary peoples distress, triggering a global backlash uniting homeowners, renters, and housing activists.

openDemocracy ↗

SMOKING GUN: Lone Star Bond Documents State Foreclosure Is Expected for Most Mortgages

The New York Times obtained a confidential bond offering document in which Lone Star assured investors that foreclosure and resale of homes is expected for most of the mortgages. The Times concluded: The acquisition of distressed mortgages by Lone Star is the engine in a well-oiled securitization machine that assumes that foreclosure and resale of the homes are inevitable components of the process. Lone Star bundles distressed mortgages into unrated bonds sold to investors, with returns coming largely from liquidation value and home sales after foreclosure.

New York Times / Chicago Reporter / ValueWalk ↗

Lone Star Owned DFC Global — Payday Lender With 33,000% APR — 32 Organizations Called Them a Loan Shark

Lone Star Funds purchased payday lender DFC Global Corp for $1.3 billion in June 2014 through Lone Star Fund VIII. DFC Global operated under brands including Money Mart and The Check Cashing Store — approximately 1,200 retail locations in 9 countries including 250 US locations. DFC advertised loans with APRs as high as 33,000%. In 2016, UNITE HERE announced that 32 consumer advocacy organizations published an open letter calling Lone Star a loan shark and demanding it end predatory lending practices. UNITE HERE launched LoanSharkFunds.org. The CFPB forced DFC's auto lending arm to return $3.3 million to more than 50,000 military servicemembers. UK regulators ordered DFC to refund £15 million to borrowers. The West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund sued DFC executives for predatory lending before the Lone Star acquisition was complete.

Business Wire / UNITE HERE / PESP / HuffPost ↗

BiggerPockets Forum — LSF9 Tenant and Neighbor Thread

A publicly accessible forum thread documents tenant and neighbor experiences with properties in the LSF9 Master Participation Trust portfolio, including the property management handoff chain involving Caliber, HHM, WRI Property Management, and RESICAP.

BiggerPockets ↗

NY AG Schneiderman Probed Caliber Home Loans for Predatory Practices — Complaints Mirror National Mortgage Settlement

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman launched an investigation into Caliber Home Loans (Lone Star subsidiary) amid allegations of predatory mortgage practices. Complaints involved foreclosure abuses, delays in document production, and poor communication with borrowers — the same issues that led to the $25 billion National Mortgage Settlement with five major banks. The CFPB had received over 1,200 complaints about Caliber nationwide, with New York among the highest-complaint states (89 complaints).

Bloomberg / National Mortgage News ↗

BPIA Investigation — LSF9 Agency Standing Analysis

Private investigator Bill Paatalo (Oregon PSID #49411) published a series of reports examining the LSF9 Master Participation Trust's role in court proceedings. According to the reporting, LSF9 MPT is characterized as operating in ways that raise questions about its standing as a plaintiff.

BPIA ↗

UNITE HERE Asked SEC to Investigate Lone Star Fee Scheme 7 Years Before Enforcement (2015)

In 2015, union UNITE HERE wrote to the SEC requesting investigation of Lone Star Funds and Hudson Advisors for undisclosed fees charged to limited partners. UNITE HERE questioned whether investors had received full accounting of fees charged by Hudson, whether Lone Star had shifted expenses from itself to Hudson without disclosure, and why Lone Star had significantly fewer investment advisory employees than peers with similar assets under management. The SEC enforcement action confirming these concerns did not come until 2022 — seven years later.

UNITE HERE / PE Closer Look ↗

CFPB: Lone Star's DFC Global Forced to Refund $3.3M to 50,000+ Military Servicemembers

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau required Dealers Financial Services, a DFC Global subsidiary owned by Lone Star Funds, to return $3.3 million to more than 50,000 military servicemembers who participated in the MILES auto lending program. UK financial regulators separately ordered DFC to refund £15 million to UK payday borrowers for overcharging. PESP documented DFC had nearly $500 million in loans outstanding as of March 2014 across 1,200 locations in 9 countries.

CFPB / PESP / Financial Times ↗

Lone Star Acquired Home Properties in 2015 — 42,107 Apartments — Then Dissolved the Company

In 2015, Lone Star Funds acquired Home Properties, a real estate investment trust that owned and operated 121 apartment complexes with 42,107 apartment units across Washington D.C., Baltimore, Philadelphia, Long Island, Northern New Jersey, Boston, Chicago, and Florida. Following the acquisition, Lone Star dissolved the company. Home Properties had specialized in acquiring older Class C and Class B- apartment communities and upgrading them.

Wikipedia / Home Properties ↗

Oregon Public Pension Employees Lawsuit — Lone Star Failed to Disclose Korean Criminal Conviction During 00M Pitch

Employees of Oregon's 8 billion public pension fund filed a lawsuit alleging Lone Star Funds failed to disclose during a January 2008 investment pitch that its Korean operations executive Paul Yoo had been convicted of stock manipulation and sentenced to five years in prison. Just two days after Lone Star's presentation to the Oregon Investment Council — which resulted in a 00 million commitment — Yoo's conviction was finalized. The lawsuit alleged Lone Star founder John Grayken was asked about the Korean charges at the meeting and dismissed them. Oregon subsequently committed another 00 million to Lone Star in 2010. The suit sought return of billion in investments.

PlanSponsor / The Oregonian ↗

Grayken: Born in Cohasset MA, Renounced US Citizenship for Tax Purposes, Divorced Wife After Becoming Tax Refugee

John Grayken was born and raised in Cohasset, Massachusetts — a suburb of Boston, the same metro area where HHM is evicting Section 8 tenants. In 1999, he renounced his American citizenship and became an Irish citizen for tax purposes, avoiding US taxation of worldwide income. He divorced his first wife soon after becoming a tax refugee, reunited within a month, then divorced again six months later. He later married British actress Eilene Davidson in London. He is described as one of the most secretive billionaires in the world.

Wikipedia / Forbes ↗

Northsight Management named alongside Hudson Homes Management

Court-record indexes list Northsight Management LLC as a co-named party with Hudson Homes Management LLC — for example, the matter captioned Raymond Anderson v. Hudson Homes Management LLC, Northsight Management LLC, as surfaced in UniCourt's court-record index. Northsight commonly operates as a field-services / property-preservation vendor.

UniCourt — court record index ↗

Ohio eviction: Hudson Homes failed to prove standing as LSF9 agent

In an Ohio eviction, Hudson Homes Management LLC claimed to be both owner and agent for the LSF9 Master Participation Trust. After the magistrate granted leave requiring proof of authority and standing, Hudson filed no responsive brief and produced no evidence beyond pointing to the county auditor's website. The magistrate ruled against it.

BPIA — Bill Paatalo Investigative Agency (Ohio magistrate decision) ↗

Pattern: post-move-out charges and in-house collections (tenant complaints)

Multiple BBB complaints describe being billed after moving out — continued charges for months after vacating, move-out damage and cleaning fees, and balances sent to collections. In one published BBB response, Hudson Homes Management stated it was continuing 'ongoing collection efforts' and preferred to deal with the tenant's attorney.

Better Business Bureau — consumer complaints ↗