Violation Summary
34 U.S.C. §12491
Violence Against Women Act — VAWA Housing Protections
Federal
Federal law requires all Section 8 landlords to provide tenants with VAWA disclosure forms at lease signing and before filing eviction. HHM failed to provide this disclosure in the Massachusetts eviction that was dismissed May 1, 2026.
Supporting Evidence
- ▸Case 25H77SP004586 — dismissed by Judge Adeyinka specifically on VAWA grounds (May 1, 2026)
- ▸Judge Adeyinka had previously dismissed two other landlords on identical VAWA facts (Cruz and Tomyl rulings)
- ▸This is Judge Adeyinka's third consecutive VAWA dismissal against a corporate landlord
- ▸HUD updated VAWA compliance forms in 2025 — HHM filed without any disclosure that year
Remedy Available
Tenant can seek damages under VAWA, Section 8 regulations, and state consumer protection law. Each violation is independently actionable.
File with: Report to HUD: hud.gov/complaints. Report to MA AG: ago.state.ma.us.
24 CFR §982.310
Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher — Good Cause Requirement
Federal (HUD)
HUD regulations require landlords to state a specific cause for termination when evicting Section 8 tenants. HHM filed a no-cause notice against a Section 8 household in Massachusetts.
Supporting Evidence
- ▸Case 25H77SP004586 — notice to quit stated no cause for termination
- ▸24 CFR §982.310 explicitly requires cause for Section 8 tenancy termination
- ▸HHM's own April 6, 2026 filing admitted it was "Agent for US Bank NA as Trustee for LSF9"
- ▸Pattern documented across multiple states: no-cause filings against Section 8 tenants
Remedy Available
Defective notice voids the eviction. Section 8 tenants receiving no-cause notices should contact legal aid immediately before any court date.
File with: Report to HUD Housing Choice Voucher program: hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/hcv
Hatcher Doctrine (Mass.) / Standing
Lack of Standing — Agent Cannot Sue as Plaintiff
Massachusetts + Multiple States
HHM files evictions as "agent" for trust entities but often names itself as plaintiff. Courts in Massachusetts and Ohio have dismissed these cases for lack of standing. Only the actual property owner can file eviction.
Supporting Evidence
- ▸MA Case 25H77SP004586: HHM's own filing admitted "Agent for US Bank NA as Trustee for LSF9"
- ▸Ohio case: HHM claimed both owner AND agent simultaneously — magistrate dismissed after HHM filed no brief on standing
- ▸FL Case (Palm Beach 2020): HHM v. Hayden — dismissed without prejudice
- ▸BPIA expert disclosure: LSF9 Master Participation Trust is a pseudonym that holds nothing
- ▸Paatalo documented VOLT LLC and LSF9 Mortgage Holdings as actual parties concealed behind LSF9 name
Remedy Available
Motion to dismiss for lack of standing. Demand plaintiff prove chain of title from origination to current holder. HHM has walked away rather than produce this documentation.
File with: File with state AG housing division. Pattern across states makes this a federal regulatory matter.
15 U.S.C. §1692 (FDCPA)
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Federal
FDCPA prohibits debt collectors from reporting debts they know are not owed, collecting amounts not authorized by agreement, and using false or deceptive means. Multiple BBB complaints document HHM reporting disputed charges after courts dismissed the underlying claims.
Supporting Evidence
- ▸Court-dismissed charges continued to accrue interest and were reported to credit bureaus
- ▸Tenant won court judgment; credit bureaus refused to remove entry despite judgment
- ▸HHM waived $8,456.89 in collection debt when challenged via BBB
- ▸HHM dropped $10,034 credit bureau entry when challenged via BBB
- ▸Signed contract explicitly waiving charges — HHM reported to collections immediately
Remedy Available
FDCPA allows recovery of actual damages + $1,000 statutory damages + attorney fees. File with CFPB: consumerfinance.gov/complaint. Consult a consumer protection attorney.
File with: CFPB: consumerfinance.gov/complaint. State AG consumer protection divisions.
SEC Release No. 34-94514 (2022)
Securities & Exchange Commission — Investment Adviser Fraud
Federal (SEC)
The SEC imposed an $11.2M civil penalty on Hudson Advisors L.P. for concealing founder John Grayken's personal tax liability in fees charged to fund investors. Grayken renounced US citizenship for tax purposes in 1999; Hudson Advisors hid this in its fee structure for years.
Supporting Evidence
- ▸SEC Civil Penalty: $11.2 million
- ▸Violation: Investment Advisers Act of 1940 §206(2)
- ▸Hudson Advisors is the fund manager for all Lone Star Funds including those controlling HHM
- ▸The same corporate chain: Grayken → Lone Star Funds → Hudson Advisors → LSF9 → US Bank Trust → HHM
Remedy Available
For institutional investors in Lone Star funds: consult securities counsel regarding undisclosed fee structures. For tenants: establishes pattern of knowing concealment across the corporate chain.
File with: SEC enforcement action is public record: sec.gov. Pension fund investors should review fund documentation.
G.L. c. 93A (Massachusetts)
Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act — Treble Damages
Massachusetts
Massachusetts 93A provides treble damages for willful/knowing unfair or deceptive trade practices. HHM's documented conduct — defective eviction filing, daily holdover charge emails during pending litigation, post-dismissal threats to re-file — establishes willful/knowing conduct.
Supporting Evidence
- ▸Eviction dismissed on three independently fatal grounds (VAWA, standing, Section 8)
- ▸Daily holdover charge emails sent during litigation — documented pattern of willful conduct
- ▸Post-dismissal settlement offer combined with threat to re-file (coercive)
- ▸"Sealed for now" language used against Section 8 voucher holder to create urgency
- ▸Kingsbury (HHM counsel) offered settlement after losing — consciousness of guilt
Remedy Available
Under G.L. c. 93A: actual damages trebled for willful/knowing violations + attorney fees. 30-day demand letter required before suit. Consult a Massachusetts tenant attorney.
File with: File complaint with Massachusetts AG: ago.state.ma.us. Reference docket 25H77SP004586.
ICSID Annulment + Korean Supreme Court
Criminal Conviction — Stock Manipulation (South Korea, upheld 2025)
International
Lone Star was criminally convicted of stock price manipulation of Korea Exchange Bank Card in South Korea. After the conviction, Lone Star filed a $4.68 billion investor-state claim. In November 2025, the ICSID annulment committee voided the entire $216.5 million award, finding the tribunal failed to account for Lone Star's criminal conduct.
Supporting Evidence
- ▸Criminal conviction: stock price manipulation, Korea Exchange Bank Card
- ▸Korean Supreme Court upheld conviction
- ▸ICSID award of $216.5 million voided November 2025 due to criminal conduct
- ▸Korean PM Kim Min-seok confirmed payment obligations entirely nullified
- ▸Separately: Delhi police accused Grayken of criminal breach of trust, cheating, criminal conspiracy (2022)
Remedy Available
Establishes that Lone Star leadership has a documented history of criminal financial misconduct in international jurisdictions. Relevant to any regulatory, legislative, or investor-facing analysis of the corporate structure controlling HHM.
File with: Korea Times / Steptoe documentation. Relevant to Congressional investigations and AG inquiries.
Tex. Fin. Code §392 / State UDAP Laws
Texas Debt Collection Act + State Unfair Practices
Texas + Multiple States
Texas Finance Code Chapter 392 prohibits unfair debt collection practices. State UDAP statutes in Texas, New Jersey, Florida, Massachusetts, and other HHM markets provide additional remedies. Documented HHM violations include collecting amounts not authorized by lease, threatening eviction to collect disputed amounts, and misrepresenting the character of debts.
Supporting Evidence
- ▸Continued charging after lease termination acknowledged by HHM
- ▸Charging amounts court dismissed as not owed
- ▸Using affiliated collection agency to circumvent court judgments
- ▸Eviction notices used as collection pressure on disputed amounts
Remedy Available
State UDAP statutes vary; many allow treble damages and attorney fees. Contact your state AG consumer protection division and consult a local consumer attorney.
File with: Texas AG: texasattorneygeneral.gov. NJ AG: njconsumeraffairs.gov. FL AG: myfloridalegal.com.
All information on this site is sourced from public court records, government filings, BBB complaints, and public social media. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. Source links are provided for every claim.